Jump to content

[mod] [mod] Daughters of Lust - updated


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, OstracizedNoOne said:

Also should add that I checked how the weight toggle mods on the workshop do it and they universally lock weight to zero for characters. Daughters of Lust doesn't change a character's weight at all, it just removes the visibility so every succubus regardless of weight looks like they're at 0 weight. As a profession Lesbian Fat Girl connoisseur this is a grave and terrible injustice.

Found it. Apparently in lines 23-28 of Succubus Portrait it replaces gene_bs_body_type with template body_fat_head_fat_low at a value of 0.4. This specific morph command apparently breaks weight display. Not sure if its because its outdated, misspelled, or incorrect values

Posted
Just now, OstracizedNoOne said:

Found it. Apparently in lines 23-28 of Succubus Portrait it replaces gene_bs_body_type with template body_fat_head_fat_low at a value of 0.4. This specific morph command apparently breaks weight display. Not sure if its because its outdated, misspelled, or incorrect values

er lines 23-28 of cdol_succubus_portrait in the gfx/portraits section. Secondarily also confirmed the command worked to set head fat display to low. Tested via Phaze Body Hairdresser Extension allowing global visible weight modification which overrides the morph. Using this, increasing weight before and after using this morph had very visible differences in double chin fat display. So the command 1) works and 2) also breaks weight display.

Posted
8 hours ago, OstracizedNoOne said:

Found it. Apparently in lines 23-28 of Succubus Portrait it replaces gene_bs_body_type with template body_fat_head_fat_low at a value of 0.4. This specific morph command apparently breaks weight display. Not sure if its because its outdated, misspelled, or incorrect values

 

8 hours ago, OstracizedNoOne said:

er lines 23-28 of cdol_succubus_portrait in the gfx/portraits section. Secondarily also confirmed the command worked to set head fat display to low. Tested via Phaze Body Hairdresser Extension allowing global visible weight modification which overrides the morph. Using this, increasing weight before and after using this morph had very visible differences in double chin fat display. So the command 1) works and 2) also breaks weight display.

 

Interesting.

For what it's worth, this was something that was done prior to my active development, and I don't necessarily fiddle with genes a lot so it's possibly something that escaped my attention.

 

This is the gene itself, with some comments from Paradox.

image.png

image.png

Posted
15 hours ago, Lyskorie said:

 

 

Interesting.

For what it's worth, this was something that was done prior to my active development, and I don't necessarily fiddle with genes a lot so it's possibly something that escaped my attention.

 

This is the gene itself, with some comments from Paradox.

image.png

image.png

I figured it was a relic because (i'm a bit sleepy and dont have CBO installed rn to peruse) body_fat_head_fat_low as a template is a CBO attribute, not a vanilla one. I'd bet that if you backported to an older version and used the original CBO rather than CBO unofficial or phaze's it would work fine. Probably could replace it with the vanilla head fat attribute but idk. If you can't take the double chin you dont deserve a heavier lady really

Posted
5 hours ago, OstracizedNoOne said:

I figured it was a relic because (i'm a bit sleepy and dont have CBO installed rn to peruse) body_fat_head_fat_low as a template is a CBO attribute, not a vanilla one. I'd bet that if you backported to an older version and used the original CBO rather than CBO unofficial or phaze's it would work fine. Probably could replace it with the vanilla head fat attribute but idk. If you can't take the double chin you dont deserve a heavier lady really

 

body_fat_head_fat_low is a vanilla gene. That snippet of code I took there was in the game's folders.

 

image.png.202dd4e742cbf8bcc82cc57b67b64c13.png

 

This bit of the code will have remained unchanged since Cheri first worked on it, and given that the earliest versions of CDOL doesn't refer to anything from any other mods outside of Carnalitas which it requires, I don't see the "it only works if CBO is installed" theory as likely.

Posted
3 hours ago, Lyskorie said:

 

body_fat_head_fat_low is a vanilla gene. That snippet of code I took there was in the game's folders.

 

image.png.202dd4e742cbf8bcc82cc57b67b64c13.png

 

This bit of the code will have remained unchanged since Cheri first worked on it, and given that the earliest versions of CDOL doesn't refer to anything from any other mods outside of Carnalitas which it requires, I don't see the "it only works if CBO is installed" theory as likely.

oh guh must've missed it

Posted

Also secondly is there any way to standardize the grand debauch along the lines of the sapphic debauch. Grand debauch gets crazy laggy if a significant number of its attendants are your lovers (i think it might be notification spam but idk).

Posted
2 hours ago, OstracizedNoOne said:

Also secondly is there any way to standardize the grand debauch along the lines of the sapphic debauch. Grand debauch gets crazy laggy if a significant number of its attendants are your lovers (i think it might be notification spam but idk).

 

Maybe. That said, I ported this content from an earlier defunct mod that was made before the current activites was in, and it seemed fine to me despite my rather poor PC so I never thought much of it.

Posted
12 hours ago, OstracizedNoOne said:

I figured it was a relic because (i'm a bit sleepy and dont have CBO installed rn to peruse) body_fat_head_fat_low as a template is a CBO attribute, not a vanilla one. I'd bet that if you backported to an older version and used the original CBO rather than CBO unofficial or phaze's it would work fine. Probably could replace it with the vanilla head fat attribute but idk. If you can't take the double chin you dont deserve a heavier lady really

 

I suppose I can try to make it more malleable (within a certain range) based on weight if one decides to opt into it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...