worik Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 29 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: Hide contents It was more like 10913 Spoiler It kept me distracted 1
Psalam Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 11 minutes ago, worik said: It was more like 10913 Hide contents It kept me distracted Did you say distracted? Spoiler Seven 'til Midnight Two Piece Gown Set 10914 1
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 5 hours ago, Psalam said: Did you say distracted? that's what i read: d i s t r a c t e d . Spoiler
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 6 hours ago, ZenBuddhist said: that's what i read: d i s t r a c t e d . Hide contents Damn! Too bad she's not a 3D image where I could rotate her and find out every word on that tattoo! Back to the future,, errr...., the past: Spoiler 1309 Sergeant Major Borland Photo C (HS85-10-10916)
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 9 minutes ago, Psalam said: Damn! Too bad she's not a 3D image where I could rotate her and find out every word on that tattoo! Back to the future,, errr...., the past: back to that tattoo: Spoiler 1
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: back to that tattoo: Hide contents Well that should satisfy my ... OCD, yeah, satisfy my OCD! Spoiler Lace and Floral Glitter Two-Piece Dress JUMP 10918
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 29 minutes ago, Psalam said: Well that should satisfy my ... OCD, yeah, satisfy my OCD! OCD or not, i shall assert you have a singular taste when it comes to floral dresses and their fillings, Dr. Psalam. for a radical change of subject: Spoiler question: since this picture has two distinct numbers — 10919 and 20809 — would we be cheating if we warp-jumped to the highest one? so next post would be 20810?
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 2 hours ago, ZenBuddhist said: OCD or not, i shall assert you have a singular taste when it comes to floral dresses and their fillings, Dr. Psalam. for a radical change of subject: Hide contents question: since this picture has two distinct numbers — 10919 and 20809 — would we be cheating if we warp-jumped to the highest one? so next post would be 20810? I'll remind you that we did that before ("accidentally" I'm sure). I'm certain CPU would be unhappy but, be that as it may, it seemed to distress Worik so I vote against it. Back to black and white: Spoiler MAKE IT RAIN 10920
Guest Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 In case you need to know the timetable of an Indian train:
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 1 hour ago, CPU said: In case you need to know the timetable of an Indian train: milady Worik will probably like it — perhaps even use this timetable —, @CPU. speaking of Trains and 10922, Spoiler
worik Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 1 hour ago, CPU said: In case you need to know the timetable of an Indian train: 19021? ? I guess you meant 10921? Spoiler Now, that this gap is fixed, we can safely move on towards 10923
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, worik said: Now, that this gap is fixed, we can safely move on towards 10923 one coming right up, milady Worik: Spoiler
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 16 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: one coming right up, milady Worik: Reveal hidden contents I just don't understand the fascination with trains: Spoiler 68-16265 Bell UH-1H Iroquois C/N 10924
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, Psalam said: I just don't understand the fascination with trains: yes; you are right, Dr. Psalam. i'm no barrister; nonetheless, according to the document below, we've got to give all subjects equal employment opportunities: Spoiler
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 21 minutes ago, worik said: Finally! I have found the bug in LL #10926 Hide contents Is that really a Spam Pension Moth? This looks retired: Spoiler
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 13 minutes ago, Psalam said: Is that really a Spam Pension Moth? This looks retired: these look unnecessary — i mean, the number of straps: Spoiler perhaps i should go back to trains, then? Spoiler
worik Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 14 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: perhaps i should go back to trains, then? I've found the twin Spoiler
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, worik said: I've found the twin Reveal hidden contents Did someone say twins? Spoiler
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Psalam said: Did someone say twins? they look pretty much alike for my tired eyes, Dr. Psalam. is/are this/these the same girl/s? Spoiler
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 3 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: they look pretty much alike for my tired eyes, Dr. Psalam. is/are this/these the same girl/s? Hide contents Could be the same twins. Maybe Quadruplets? Sometimes it's the same person and the shot just makes it look like twins: Spoiler 10932 20019MagentaPink Wedding Occasional Wear
worik Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 I think, we should consider 10933 an "adult" Spoiler https://www.bahnbilder.de/1200/10933-koblenz--ch--743290.jpg https://www.bahnbilder.de/bild/schweiz~e-loks~ae-4-7/743290/10933-koblenz--ch--140787.html Edit: Embedding an image isn't working... again ?
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 55 minutes ago, worik said: I think, we should consider 10933 an "adult" Hide contents https://www.bahnbilder.de/1200/10933-koblenz--ch--743290.jpg https://www.bahnbilder.de/bild/schweiz~e-loks~ae-4-7/743290/10933-koblenz--ch--140787.html Edit: Embedding an image isn't working... again ? As opposed, I assume you mean, to a retired old geezer. Well, it's just possible that you hit the bullseye: Spoiler Spina 20 gr Model #10934
ZenBuddhist Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 11 minutes ago, Psalam said: As opposed, I assume you mean, to a retired old geezer. Well, it's just possible that you hit the bullseye: isn't "geezer" supposed an archaic vocable, Dr. Psalam? speaking of which: #10935. Spoiler
Psalam Posted August 1, 2019 Posted August 1, 2019 2 hours ago, ZenBuddhist said: isn't "geezer" supposed an archaic vocable, Dr. Psalam? speaking of which: #10935. Hide contents NOT World of Warcraft: Spoiler
Recommended Posts