Guest Hanzx Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7moRETUQ5B4 By: Gaming Wildlife they make honest video's like screen junkies but for games studios. top quality video's & they do Their research. i recommend that u watch the whole video. what is told is sad but honestly true.
Leito86 Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 I hate to break the news so publicly but Bethesda is cheating on you with Ben....
Vykroft Posted May 12, 2016 Posted May 12, 2016 Well you have other options to consider, like: - CDProyectRed (without a friendly modding tool ) - Talesworld (modding tool will be on the way for Bannerlord ) - Warhorse Studios (mooding tool will be available , and the free sdk version of the engine is free to download, a little outdated though... ) And probably others, you really don't need to marry Bethesda, but... a lot of fans don't even consider the possibility of migrate to another company for modding purpose... yup true story.
Guest endgameaddiction Posted May 12, 2016 Posted May 12, 2016 That is true. And the purpose behind that has many answers. One of those major reasons being the amount of flexibility of the toolkit. Something you don't get as much with CD Project and W3 from what I have read. I can easily give Bethesda credit for that, But I still want to see what happens when the the Fallout 4 CK comes out of beta. We know that CK for Fallout 4 is only PC exclusive. Console gamers have no way to mod their game through the console. They have to buy Fallout 4 for PC and download the Creation Kit via bethesda.net. Is the Creation Kit going to be limited? My guess is that it would be because the CK right now from what I'm reading can be used to make mods for console. And I highly doubt they want to release a toolkit that has the capability of implementing things that can cause more problems with console mods and systems. If they plan to release 2 different versions of the CK for PC. One for basic modding and the other for complex modding such as scripting, then I would view things from a different perspective, but honestly don't see that happening.
devious-Drunna Posted May 12, 2016 Posted May 12, 2016 My understanding is that the CK toolkit is no different than past toolkits. Most of my toolkit use since Fallout3 was world editing, adding in static assets, but not much into scripting. Most if not all user created mods will have to go through BethesdaNet if consoles want to use player mods. By going through BethesdaNet, they hope to have the capability to weed out mods that causes major mod conflicts, crashes, or mods that require complicated fixes and trial/error to keep the game stable on consoles. Bethesda did state that PC uses do not have to go through BethesdaNet to upload player created mods and can install mods from places like here or nexus. Consoles probably could do the same, but doubt Bethesda will help if the non-sanctioned "BethesdaNet" mod crashes your console.
Molevalence Posted May 13, 2016 Posted May 13, 2016 No gaming company will be 100% honest. No one will be 100% honest. To think that you're just naive.
Crimson Steel Posted June 2, 2016 Posted June 2, 2016 I really wish they make the new elder scrolls in a newer engine. But... they won't. I really hope Bethesda doesn't start a trend for other companies on depending on the modding community to complete their games
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.