pokemon Pokémon Nude Mods Project

[Viewier]

40 minutes ago, personmcguy said:

The final boss himself is done!

Side note, it was probably deliberate but I find it strange that Red has no battle portrait

Y'know, that is kinda strange.

It was probably done on purpose, though.

You didn't have a battle portrait in Fire Red, so why would Red get one of those newfangled things?

He knows how important he is. He doesn't need a battle portrait to boost his ego.

[Viewier]

Also, I learned that shift + v flips aseprite's canvas horizontally.

Idk if that will be useful later or not.

[Viewier]

On 9/3/2025 at 11:08 PM, Viewier said:

The completion of the Kimono Girl nude box reminded me of something.

I'm adding the above four box patterns into Hairy Gold and Shaved Silver.

I want you guys to vote on the other 8 I add.

Do you mind doing another survey?

This was the best way I could think to do it.

https://forms.gle/MzWDpBdVafpNoXNK7

 

Six responses now!

I'm honestly a little surprised that Team Galactic is doing poorly despite being one of the edited ones.

Though then again, they're not in the game and they're also literal terrorists in that world, so maybe making your PC background an image of them isn't the best idea. lol

[personmcguy]

50 minutes ago, Viewier said:

Y'know, that is kinda strange.

It was probably done on purpose, though.

You didn't have a battle portrait in Fire Red, so why would Red get one of those newfangled things?

He knows how important he is. He doesn't need a battle portrait to boost his ego.

I feel like I have a memory of him having one as a kid tho, maybe its like a Mandela Effect thing, or I saw it in like a RomHack (edited his neck a little more in sprite one)

Edited September 5, 2025 by personmcguy

[Noillus]

2 hours ago, Viewier said:

Y'know, that is kinda strange.

It was probably done on purpose, though.

You didn't have a battle portrait in Fire Red, so why would Red get one of those newfangled things?

He knows how important he is. He doesn't need a battle portrait to boost his ego.

 

Red does have his VS battle portrait in Fire Red, it however is just a closed up version of his Trainer card sprite and in contrast of subsequent games, it only displays at the Elite 4 and Champion battle.

I don't blame you for not remembering when it displays only in your 1% of the gameplay opposite of almost every "boss" trainer battle...

 

 

5 hours ago, Viewier said:

Maybe he's just moving his hand from a wave to putting it on his hip?

Idk. Maybe somebody just really didn't like belts since that counts as "too much clothing."

 

If I were to justify the lack of belt, I'd say it's an usage of "hammerspace" trope, where the character just spawns in an object from behind of themselves. When I tried out Catnatic's Legend Arceus dialogue mod for a while, Prof. Laventon referenced the protagonist shoving the Arc-phone into their butt. Don't question cartoon physics too much.

[Morgil]

9 hours ago, Viewier said:

Six responses now!

I'm honestly a little surprised that Team Galactic is doing poorly despite being one of the edited ones.

Though then again, they're not in the game and they're also literal terrorists in that world, so maybe making your PC background an image of them isn't the best idea. lol

When I voted, I gave low ranks to any wallpapers that carried over from D/P/Pl cuz they weren't really relevant to HG/SS. Stuff like the Shinno starters, Dialga/Palkia, and Team Galactic, for example. Also, as a side note, I've always felt Team Rocket was way cooler than Galactic, anyway.

Edited September 5, 2025 by Morgil

[Nexstage]

Spoiler

 

Hi @Viewier, not sure if this had been pointed out for Platinude, but the Parasol ladies at route 212 are unedited, playing the only female nude version for Platinum Rev 1, possible to update sprite when you are free?

[Viewier]

18 minutes ago, Nexstage said:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Hi @Viewier, not sure if this had been pointed out for Platinude, but the Parasol ladies at route 212 are unedited, playing the only female nude version for Platinum Rev 1, possible to update sprite when you are free?

oh. i had no clue. dang. That's unacceptable.

 

13-Platinum Rev 1F.zip

Edited September 6, 2025 by Viewier

[Viewier]

 

On 9/2/2025 at 8:13 PM, Viewier said:

 

Which Erika do we want?

I noticed that the Erika with the sleeves I posted got a lot of likes and was unsure which to include.

[Morgil]

I like da sleeves

[Viewier]

Update 5 seems like it's going to be pretty big.

It may take longer than expected. Sorry.

Edited September 6, 2025 by Viewier

[Kamivax]

34 minutes ago, Viewier said:

 

Which Erika do we want?

I noticed that the Erika with the sleeves I posted got a lot of likes and was unsure which to include.

I also like the sleeves

[Solovan0116]

The one with sleeves 

[Viewier]

Chat, we did it.

Thank you so much, Jay-San.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESQjr7OB1pA

Petrel will still be messed up until his edit is made, but this is as good as we're going to get for Proton.

It just sucks that there's nothing I can do about the grey blocks.

Edited September 6, 2025 by Viewier

[Kamivax]

33 minutes ago, Viewier said:

Chat, we did it.

Thank you so much, Jay-San.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESQjr7OB1pA

Petrel will still be messed up until his edit is made, but this is as good as we're going to get for Proton.

It just sucks that there's nothing I can do about the grey blocks.

Pain

[personmcguy]

3 hours ago, Viewier said:

 

Which Erika do we want?

I noticed that the Erika with the sleeves I posted got a lot of likes and was unsure which to include.

I think the sleeves are cute but I think that due to her arm position, it covers up too much of her edits in the 2nd and 3rd sprite

[Nexstage]

I prefer no sleeves, and also I believe it defeat the purpose of the of a 'nude mod' to have any form of clothing and footwear on a character, short of some small hair accessories for styling purpose, it would a 'lewd mod' to have pointless pieces of cloth or even just shoes only, not an authentic 'nude mod', imo.

[Viewier]

13 minutes ago, Nexstage said:

I prefer no sleeves, and also I believe it defeat the purpose of the of a 'nude mod' to have any form of clothing and footwear on a character, short of some small hair accessories for styling purpose, it would a 'lewd mod' to have pointless pieces of cloth or even just shoes only, not an authentic 'nude mod', imo.

 

32 minutes ago, personmcguy said:

I think the sleeves are cute but I think that due to her arm position, it covers up too much of her edits in the 2nd and 3rd sprite

 

Oh yeah, you're right.

The purpose of the nude mod is nudity for nudity's sake, not for any lewd reasons at all.

Adding too many clothes could make it seem like the clothes are only there to accentuate the nude parts.

Maybe letting most characters keep their shoes sent us down the wrong path.

 

Maybe we should edit the Kimono Girl's sprite too so that the boob isn't covered.

It's possible that you could see them from the back.

 

And while it would stink to edit due to the leg positions, maybe the PokeManiac also needs his pants entirely gone.

It seems kinda lewd to wear pants and then have a random dick hole, and lewdness is not what this project is about.

Edited September 7, 2025 by Viewier

[Morgil]

Aw, I liked all those edits. Don't change them 😭

[personmcguy]

1 hour ago, Viewier said:

 

 

Oh yeah, you're right.

The purpose of the nude mod is nudity for nudity's sake, not for any lewd reasons at all.

Adding too many clothes could make it seem like the clothes are only there to accentuate the nude parts.

Maybe letting most characters keep their shoes sent us down the wrong path.

 

Maybe we should edit the Kimono Girl's sprite too so that the boob isn't covered.

It's possible that you could see them from the back.

 

And while it would stink to edit due to the leg positions, maybe the PokeManiac also needs his pants entirely gone.

It seems kinda lewd to wear pants and then have a random dick hole, and lewdness is not what this project is about.

Yeah, but again the problem I think we'll end up having is recognizability. As I said before, not only does removing all these hats and capes, and other stuff make a lot more work for spriters (the countless front sprites, backsprites, battle portraits, OW sprites, and more for not just this game but also DPPt), and create more instances where we'll just have to make shit up and forego accuracy; it also makes things more difficult for the player. For me the accessories aren't about accentuating the naked bits, but to keep the bits of great character design that the games give us whilst also making the characters unique and differentiable.

And where do we draw the line at accessories? Is the guitarist's guitar an accessory (it's literally in his name and without it he's not a guitarist, just a guy with long hair)? How about the biker's bikes? The fisherman's tacklebox and fishing rod? How about the robber's sunglasses, hat, and mask (we have no idea what his face looks like so we just gotta make shit up)? Glasses and canes that people need to be able to go about their day?

For example we earlier had the bug catcher and the youngter and the camper edited without hats for their battle sprites. Now this is of course a big enough change that it would effect their overworld sprites. If we edit these sprites to lose their hats, then is anyone going to be realistically able to differentiate them at first glance, espeically if you're running or playing with speed up?

What about these girls?  We remove their hair pins and clothes and how do we tell them apart in the slightest?

How about the painter and the gentleman, who are both grey haired men with moustaches and removing any of their accessories? 

 

I've also said before, many trainers have poses or animations that just make no sense if you remove their hats or accessories or whatnot. Example, we remove Blaine's hat, glasses, and cane. First of all, he probably needs that cane, he's pretty old. Secondly

What the hell is he gonna be doing in his battle sprite? Unless we just want to completely change it or make up something new?

Another example, the only difference between these two Pryce sprites is the fluttering scarf

The police man, we remove his accessories, we have no reference for his hair, or his hands, and he has nothing that makes him recognizable. Sure he could keep his baton and flashlight, but where does he keep it then without his belt? In his ass? I feel like that potential implication is more lewd than the potential accentuation of nudity by keeping them. 

 

I will admit the pokemaniac was an odd choice from me, but then again so is the pokemaniac, its kinda in his name. At the time I wasn't sure what kind of edit I could make to him that would make sense and still be recognizable. Now what we could just do is have it edited to only have the feet of the costume but then we lose the tail as well which helps complete his silhouette, but how do y'all feel? The legs might look rough but keep in mind, I have literally NO fucking reference to what they look like

However still, the pokemaniac, without any of his suit, is just another naked dude, nothing that identifies him as his trainer class, he's not a "pokemaniac" just a "maniac", if that.

 

I understand the sentiment of wanting to remove all clothing & accessories, it doesn't make for good (or easy) game design.

(And if we want to remove accessories, Gen 5 sprites are going to fuckin suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck)

At the end of the day though, it's not my project, I'm just a spriter. I will say though, the sudden and massive influx of sprite edits (probably close to all of the human sprites in the game) ranging from small to drastic edits would be very overwhelming for me and probably most spriters.

Edited September 7, 2025 by personmcguy

[personmcguy]

29 minutes ago, Morgil said:

Aw, I liked all those edits. Don't change them 😭

Thanks homie < 3

[Nexstage]

Just want to give my opinions

30 minutes ago, personmcguy said:

Yeah, but again the problem I think we'll end up having is recognizability. As I said before, not only does removing all these hats and capes, and other stuff make a lot more work for spriters (the countless front sprites, backsprites, battle portraits, OW sprites, and more for not just this game but also DPPt), and create more instances where we'll just have to make shit up and forego accuracy; it also makes things more difficult for the player. For me the accessories aren't about accentuating the naked bits, but to keep the bits of great character design that the games give us whilst also making the characters unique and differentiable.

I do not have any skill for the work involved but I understand its a time consuming process, however, given that this project had been labeled 'Nude mod', I believe the idea is to remove every form of clothing and accessories from the characters. By accuracy, do you mean the drawing of fingers and toes, especially those that was holding something for fingers? Pixel art is difficult to accurately portray them so I am fine with them looking a bit off.

 

Personally, I think the pose of the characters is good enough to differentiate during battle, OW sprite is largely generic anyway outside of the relevant characters.

 

1 hour ago, personmcguy said:

And where do we draw the line at accessories? Is the guitarist's guitar an accessory (it's literally in his name and without it he's not a guitarist, just a guy with long hair)? How about the biker's bikes? The fisherman's tacklebox and fishing rod? How about the robber's sunglasses, hat, and mask (we have no idea what his face looks like so we just gotta make shit up)? Glasses and canes that people need to be able to go about their day?

I see your point in these example, things like guitar and bikes are more equipment than accessories, one is for their role which can stay, the other is for style. I just prefer if only small accessories remain like hairpins, the maid headdress, ear rings, etc.

 

For characters with feature that were hidden by things like sunglasses, if they spriters are welling, they can draw those how they want if they wish to do so (which is pretty much what they are doing for boobs, ass and pussy, no?), these is no deadline to this project and if they want to put the effort in, and its fine if they don't want to so long as the body of the character is without clothing.

 

2 hours ago, personmcguy said:

For example we earlier had the bug catcher and the youngter and the camper edited without hats for their battle sprites. Now this is of course a big enough change that it would effect their overworld sprites. If we edit these sprites to lose their hats, then is anyone going to be realistically able to differentiate them at first glance, espeically if you're running or playing with speed up?

What about these girls?  We remove their hair pins and clothes and how do we tell them apart in the slightest?

As mentioned earlier OW sprites aren't really that critical imo, I'm fine with them looking the similar so long their battle sprites are nude.

 

2 hours ago, personmcguy said:

I understand the sentiment of wanting to remove all clothing & accessories, it doesn't make for good (or easy) game design.

(And if we want to remove accessories, Gen 5 sprites are going to fuckin suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck)

At the end of the day though, it's not my project, I'm just a spriter. I will say though, the sudden and massive influx of sprite edits (probably close to all of the human sprites in the game) ranging from small to drastic edits would be very overwhelming for me and probably most spriters.

 

And I thank you and the other spriters for the time and efforts put into this project, I just prefer it if the edits actually represent the project title of 'nude', in the very least I hope you all could remove all the clothing and footwears from the characters, if you feel its too much efforts to do certain areas, so be it, you all aren't paid and this is a passion project, I take what I can get.

 

Have a good day/night.

[Zorai]

2 hours ago, personmcguy said:

Yeah, but again the problem I think we'll end up having is recognizability. As I said before, not only does removing all these hats and capes, and other stuff make a lot more work for spriters (the countless front sprites, backsprites, battle portraits, OW sprites, and more for not just this game but also DPPt), and create more instances where we'll just have to make shit up and forego accuracy; it also makes things more difficult for the player. For me the accessories aren't about accentuating the naked bits, but to keep the bits of great character design that the games give us whilst also making the characters unique and differentiable.

And where do we draw the line at accessories? Is the guitarist's guitar an accessory (it's literally in his name and without it he's not a guitarist, just a guy with long hair)? How about the biker's bikes? The fisherman's tacklebox and fishing rod? How about the robber's sunglasses, hat, and mask (we have no idea what his face looks like so we just gotta make shit up)? Glasses and canes that people need to be able to go about their day?

For example we earlier had the bug catcher and the youngter and the camper edited without hats for their battle sprites. Now this is of course a big enough change that it would effect their overworld sprites. If we edit these sprites to lose their hats, then is anyone going to be realistically able to differentiate them at first glance, espeically if you're running or playing with speed up?

What about these girls?  We remove their hair pins and clothes and how do we tell them apart in the slightest?

How about the painter and the gentleman, who are both grey haired men with moustaches and removing any of their accessories? 

 

I've also said before, many trainers have poses or animations that just make no sense if you remove their hats or accessories or whatnot. Example, we remove Blaine's hat, glasses, and cane. First of all, he probably needs that cane, he's pretty old. Secondly

What the hell is he gonna be doing in his battle sprite? Unless we just want to completely change it or make up something new?

Another example, the only difference between these two Pryce sprites is the fluttering scarf

The police man, we remove his accessories, we have no reference for his hair, or his hands, and he has nothing that makes him recognizable. Sure he could keep his baton and flashlight, but where does he keep it then without his belt? In his ass? I feel like that potential implication is more lewd than the potential accentuation of nudity by keeping them. 

 

I will admit the pokemaniac was an odd choice from me, but then again so is the pokemaniac, its kinda in his name. At the time I wasn't sure what kind of edit I could make to him that would make sense and still be recognizable. Now what we could just do is have it edited to only have the feet of the costume but then we lose the tail as well which helps complete his silhouette, but how do y'all feel? The legs might look rough but keep in mind, I have literally NO fucking reference to what they look like

However still, the pokemaniac, without any of his suit, is just another naked dude, nothing that identifies him as his trainer class, he's not a "pokemaniac" just a "maniac", if that.

 

I understand the sentiment of wanting to remove all clothing & accessories, it doesn't make for good (or easy) game design.

(And if we want to remove accessories, Gen 5 sprites are going to fuckin suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck)

At the end of the day though, it's not my project, I'm just a spriter. I will say though, the sudden and massive influx of sprite edits (probably close to all of the human sprites in the game) ranging from small to drastic edits would be very overwhelming for me and probably most spriters.

 

I think the better option is keeping the hat and cane for Blaine, as wells as his glasses. Same with Pryce and his scarf and cane. And I still think the Pokemaniac should just be shirtless. I think its nicer to imagine he's naked under the suit, rather then seeing it first hand. Same with the officer and his hat and belt.

 

Saying this as someone who is a nudist and sees the body as more then just a sex object, nudity isn't just having nothing at all. Its more so the feeling of being free with nothing to constrict you. To feel comfortable and truly be ourselves. There's many who do wear shoes, as well as small things that aren't constricting, which a hat and scarf would indeed be things that don't really bother us. Same with a belt.

In short, its mainly pants and shirts that are mainly problematic, not so much accessories. Even if I got the chance to live in a nice community where its accepted, I'd still have shoes to protect my feet, and a fanny pack for holding things when going out and about.

 

Just my input on the matter anyway. I love what all has been done so far but I do agree with keeping some semblance of identity and the like. Either which way, I'm happy just to see this whole thing coming along.

[Morgil]

Maybe we should do another poll on this?

[Sophistz]

For some characters it would make more sense for them to have little to no clothing like Erika being a naturist for example. Maybe keep accessories like hats or capes to keep their identities, but still remove as much clothing possible including shoes? For some that wear boots they can be made exceptions since it's for protection, but the ones that can be casually nude they should be barefoot even if they have a hat or cape right?