Jump to content

The Banning Game - II


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for not appreciating the sheer joy of being feline free after about 30 years. Little details got overlooked.

Banned! for not enjoying being a feline's slave for 30 years.

Posted
1 minute ago, Swanky said:

Banned! for not enjoying being a feline's slave for 30 years.

BANNED! for suggesting that serving cats (up to 13 at one time) could be fun.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for suggesting that serving cats (up to 13 at one time) could be fun.

BANNED! for writing something I can sympathise and agree with (having had 16 at one time  LOL )

Posted
1 minute ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for writing something I can sympathise and agree with (having had 16 at one time  LOL )

BANNED! for agreeing with me. (How could you be so foolish)

Posted
5 hours ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for agreeing with me. (How could you be so foolish)

BANNED! for assuming that any agreement pertaining to the sharing, in mere literary form. of the vicissitudes of a life of cat care, as put forward in an expression of mutual self pity regarding the implied actual, or potential, consequences of such, does, in itself, imply some, or any, form of fundamental agreement with the author on anything pertaining to their actual persona, or indeed to any other real or fictional event which they might experience  

Posted
2 minutes ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for assuming that any agreement pertaining to the sharing, in mere literary form. of the vicissitudes of a life of cat care, as put forward in an expression of mutual self pity regarding the implied actual, or potential, consequences of such, does, in itself, imply some, or any, form of fundamental agreement with the author on anything pertaining to their actual persona, or indeed to any other real or fictional event which they might experience  

BANNED! for the purveying of pestilential political parlance (or perhaps unlicensed lawyerly literature)

Posted
4 hours ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for the purveying of pestilential political parlance (or perhaps unlicensed lawyerly literature)

BANNED! for attributing any form of lawyerly like drivel to me (even if I have a degree including a smattering of such stuff  :wacko: )

Posted
12 hours ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for attributing any form of lawyerly like drivel to me (even if I have a degree including a smattering of such stuff  :wacko: )

BANNED! for denying the obvious evidence of your erudite, if arrogant, legal reasoning.

Posted
17 hours ago, Psalam said:

Amy

BANNED for referring to completey meaningless random wenches from your nearby waterhole, just because they are picky.

Posted
3 hours ago, worik said:

BANNED for referring to completey meaningless random wenches from your nearby waterhole, just because they are picky.

BANNED! for failing to recognize a popular television title.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for failing to recognize a popular television title.

BANNED for assuming I would be so 80' to still own a TV

Posted
9 minutes ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for being born in the age of almost universal television

BANNED! for making that read as a bad thing.

Posted
16 minutes ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for possibly thinking that it's not ....

BANNED! for assuming cogitation had anything to do with it.

Posted
19 minutes ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for being rude about the new thread fodder

BANNED! for suggesting politeness as a way of communication, how 19th century of you.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for suggesting politeness as a way of communication, how 19th century of you.

BANNED     for    having   such   an  euphemistic  view   on    the    19th     century      ! 

Posted
Just now, worik said:

BANNED for having such an euphemistic view on the 19th century

BANNED! because my view of the 19th century may be cynical but it is hardly euphemistic.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! because my view of the 19th century may be cynical but it is hardly euphemistic.

BANNED! for seemingly espousing an overarching cynicism that contains a degree of overreach that will almost certainly not be warranted

Posted
29 minutes ago, donkeywho said:

BANNED! for seemingly espousing an overarching cynicism that contains a degree of overreach that will almost certainly not be warranted

BANNED! for redundancy after redundancy after redundancy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...