Request for "NoSexPossible" faction

[fishburger67]

Because sexlab is the basis for many sex mods, it would be nice to have you include a "NoSexPossible" faction that could be used when us modders want to exclude the sexlab related dialogs for certain Actors.

 

For example, I have Sexlab Romance and LoversComfort installed.  I am working on a mod that has some potential followers chained up.  It should not be possible to have sex with them, but the dialog options for these two mods show up in what is an unnatural way.  Worse, with some restraints, having sex with them releases them from the restraints.

 

If you could add this faction, I could then lobby the other mod authors to include it in their mods.

 

Thanks for considering it.

[enkephalin07]

That would be really useful if you're just testing and observing in an area.

[WaxenFigure]

The Sexlab Framework already supports a keyword ("SexlabForbid") for NPCs that are not to be used in any sex acts, all you really need to do is to talk to the authors and convince them to add checks for that keyword on NPCs to their dialogs.

 

 

[pihwht]

Because sexlab is the basis for many sex mods, it would be nice to have you include a "NoSexPossible" faction that could be used when us modders want to exclude the sexlab related dialogs for certain Actors.

 

For example, I have Sexlab Romance and LoversComfort installed.  I am working on a mod that has some potential followers chained up.  It should not be possible to have sex with them, but the dialog options for these two mods show up in what is an unnatural way.  Worse, with some restraints, having sex with them releases them from the restraints.

 

If you could add this faction, I could then lobby the other mod authors to include it in their mods.

 

Thanks for considering it.

 

One thing you might try is a blocking topic for the selected npcs unless you want them to talk about other topics from mods other than your own.  Often you can keep them away from other dialogue choices from other mods.

 

[fishburger67]

The Sexlab Framework already supports a keyword ("SexlabForbid") for NPCs that are not to be used in any sex acts, all you really need to do is to talk to the authors and convince them to add checks for that keyword on NPCs to their dialogs.

 

You can't add or remove keywords in papyrus that I am aware of.

 

Also, blocking topics work, but only in certain cases.  That is exactly what I am doing now, but it is not useful everywhere.

 

Really need a SexForbidden or some such faction.  That is universally supported in dialogs and would take the authors like 30 seconds to add.  It would not be needed to be checked by SexLab itself, only by mod authors using sexlab, most notably loverscomfort and sexlabromance who give us lots of dialog options that are not appropriate for someone chained up.

 

Having this faction is just using SexLab as a central spot that is known to have this faction so it can be used by sexlab mod authors.

[andrea fin]

isnt there a forbiddenfaction as well?

if you type help forbidden in console it should come up. i am pretty sure there was something like that, just not sure how its processed by sexlab. 

(ty to google)

its in one of the psc files > if a.HasKeywordString("SexLabForbid") || a.IsInFaction(ForbiddenFaction)

[WaxenFigure]

isnt there a forbiddenfaction as well?

if you type help forbidden in console it should come up. i am pretty sure there was something like that, just not sure how its processed by sexlab. 

(ty to google)

its in one of the psc files > if a.HasKeywordString("SexLabForbid") || a.IsInFaction(ForbiddenFaction)

 

Yes there is a forbidden faction but it is not set up anywhere so it effectively doesn't exist.

 

The line which would set it up is commented out (and incomplete).

 

 

    ; ForbiddenFaction =        Game.GetFormFromFile(0x, "SexLab.esm")

[fishburger67]

Thanks so much, the faction is SexLabForbiddenActors.  I'll head over to loverscomfort and sexlab romance and see if I can convince them to use it.