SexLabNoStripDUPLICATE001 has been created without my knowledge...

[nehaberlan]

Hi,

 

I created follower.

 

I added skin armor.

I use:

Schlongs of Skyrim - Core.esm

SexLab.esm

SexLabAroused.esm as default.

 

In the "Keywords", Editor ID part, I added "SexLabNoStrip".

Then, when I checked the skin again after several saving/reopening the .esp file.

I noticed that "SexLabNoStrip" renamed as "SexLabNoStripDUPLICATE001".

I deleted this new duplicate001 file, and added the original file again.

Same result. I got it back.

I googled it.

https://www.loverslab.com/topic/22612-sexlabnostrip/

Someone says:

I'm guessing that's probably why the keyword isn't working? Within the context of the mod while loaded in game, it contains the keyword string "SexLabNoStripDUPLICATE", and not just "SexLabNoStrip"? If so, is the only way to get this keyword working properly to have Sexlab as a dependency for my assets file?

 

Ashal says:

That's exactly it, it checks for "SexLabNoStrip" exactly, the DUPLICATE suffix will kill it. If you want to avoid the dependency, load your esp into creationkit without SexLab.esm checked, and create your own keyword with the name "SexLabNoStrip" then add that keyword to the item.

 

 

and this:

http://www.loverslab.com/topic/21484-devious-devices-integration-now-with-quests/?p=564711

In the second link, it said as the answer was the load order.

So, I put SOS esm file after the SexLab.esm

 

Then, In the Mod Manager, I deselected "SexLab.esm".

I opened my .esp file.

 

I checked all of skin armor(s) that had SexLabNoStripDUPLICATE001.

 

There was none. All of the files had SexLabNoStrip.

 

I saved my file.

 

Then, I opened .esp file again. But, this time, SexLab.esm was selected.

No problem...

 

Can anyone explain me why this problem has occurred? What I have to do not to have this problem again?

If is it occurred again and I couldn't notice it, might it cause any problem?

 

Thank You in advance...

 

Nehaberlan...

 

Edited July 30, 2023 by nehaberlan

[Ashal]

It just means the plugin is adding it's own NoStrip keyword with the same name to avoid the sexlab.esm dependence. It's harmless and will function fine.

 

Quote

Ashal says:

That's exactly it, it checks for "SexLabNoStrip" exactly, the DUPLICATE suffix will kill it. If you want to avoid the dependency, load your esp into creationkit without SexLab.esm checked, and create your own keyword with the name "SexLabNoStrip" then add that keyword to the item.

 

I never said that. The function does not search for "SexLabNoStrip". It only searches if the phrase "NoStrip" is in the keyword name. The keyword could be named BlahBlahNoStripDUPLICATE01 and it will still work fine.

 

If it's not working, it's either because the mod you're using to that does the stripping is overriding with it's own strip rules or your own strip settings from the stripping editor in sexlab's mcm is overruling the keyword.

[nehaberlan]

27 minutes ago, Ashal said:

It just means the plugin is adding it's own NoStrip keyword with the same name to avoid the sexlab.esm dependence. It's harmless and will function fine.

 

 

I never said that. The function does not search for "SexLabNoStrip". It only searches if the phrase "NoStrip" is in the keyword name. The keyword could be named BlahBlahNoStripDUPLICATE01 and it will still work fine.

 

If it's not working, it's either because the mod you're using to that does the stripping is overriding with it's own strip rules or your own strip settings from the stripping editor in sexlab's mcm is overruling the keyword.

 

I got this from here:

 

 

[nehaberlan]

29 minutes ago, Ashal said:

The function does not search for "SexLabNoStrip". It only searches if the phrase "NoStrip" is in the keyword name. The keyword could be named BlahBlahNoStripDUPLICATE01 and it will still work fine.

 

That was what I want to know.

 

I've never had any problem after my Skin Armor files have been renamed by SexLabNoStripDUPLICATE001 in the Creation Kit.

 

I was just curious why it happens again.

 

Thank You...

 

 

[Ashal]

2 hours ago, nehaberlan said:

 

I got this from here:

 

 

 

 

That was 10 years ago, must've forgotten. However, it's long since changed and the duplicate no longer matters for any version of SexLab from the past handful of years.