Jump to content

Rose66

  • entries
    57
  • comments
    13
  • views
    8,442

Charles Darwin - The Protozoa - Part II/IV


rose66_

751 views

darwin-en-1.png?w=1400
darwin-en-2.png?w=1400darwin-en-3.png?w=1400darwin-en-4.png?w=1400darwin-en-5.png?w=1400darwin-en-6.png?w=1400darwin-en-7.png?w=1400darwin-en-8.png?w=1400darwin-en-9.png?w=1400darwin-en-10.png?w=1400darwin-en-11.png?w=1400darwin-en-12.png?w=1400darwin-en-13.png?w=1400darwin-en-14.png?w=1400darwin-en-15.png?w=1400darwin-en-16.png?w=1400darwin-en-17.png?w=1400darwin-en-18.png?w=1400darwin-en-19.png?w=1398

 

Observation notes:

 

Charles Darwin was also captured: But it’s answering his process in freedom, along with the other monkeys. This because he denied his founded treasure. What many don’t know it’s that, for Charles Darwin, the sex was an abominable mystery. Darwin didn’t know when and how the sex appeared. And his explanation, was what turned possible, from creationism an evolutionism. The natural selection of the sex was the explanation of Darwin: the reproductive ones, would be the ones chosen by God: The finality of the Nature it’s the Creationism, the procreation. The maintenance of the seed would be the living proof of the survival of the predestined one: it’s the angle of the “grow thee and multiply thee”: it’s where the viruses are equally angled, in the position LUCA. But it’s known that the viruses aren’t partakers of the cloning: They need, obligatorily, of a new living being to coexist. For not being angle of a replication, the genetical heritage, vertical, from father to son, would fall towards a laterality, for the Tree of Life don’t have indeed a common ancestor. In mode that the position of the actual genetic, it’s equal to the one of Charles Darwin, a half-truth. The bitterness of the beginning in proving its principle, it’s resemblance to the frustration of the book. This did also happen to CERN, to Einstein, and with Newton. The truth, without a beginning, will never find its final. This is the hidden treasure.

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

It seems to me that letting the text corrector displayed do somewhat lessen the read. Same for the [sex] & [pleasure] tags which seems somewhat more of a clickbait than anything, regardless the added lines after the comic.

 

That being said, the thinking behind the characters is interesting, and the poses and expressions well managed. :)

Link to comment

It seems to me that letting the text corrector displayed do somewhat lessen the read. Same for the [sex] & [pleasure] tags which seems somewhat more of a clickbait than anything, regardless the added lines after the comic.

 

That being said, the thinking behind the characters is interesting, and the poses and expressions well managed. :)

Cloth wasn’t made to take off… more than a culture, it’s an incomprehension.

The tags #sex and #pleasure: Yup, I know: But this is because the histories are passing by the distaste: but it’s what the Book is: the entire Book may be resumed to an understanding of what is the sex and the pleasure: we may talk hours about this, years about this, an entire life: it’s something that the humanity needs to answer: the cloth. In the histories, my own scalp will be present, but I think that no one it’s able to talk like this, without clothing, because the intimacy it’s something complicated: one hides itself it’s more ‘exciting’.. and maintain a dialog like this, it’s what one consumes: but I say that this is very few, and basic.. this generates hungry.. and you end up not eating, exactly: The pleasure isn’t something unidimensional, and imagination isn’t dream. But think, it’s impossible you read and don’t participate. For this, it’s not a waste. The tension will increase: the image has to go beyond the barrier of the vision, for otherwise you would enter in spontaneous submission: you don’t have how to understand: it’s not usual what’s being made. I almost reach to apologize for the Book having appeared in the nature.

Many Hollywood actors were captured, and their intimacies will may be seen, but think: it’s impossible to violate the intimacy of someone without being violated as well. But if you readed the intimacy of Bethel, Pitt and Farrell ended up killing each other: it’s to misunderstand that the sex kills the pleasure: the permission it’s involved in a taste strange to the nature: until where one must go became the mark of a result: There exist problems in the movies, in the scripts…: and this is falsity, they could have done better.

You will understand better this, following up the stories, they’re one year late, but the time has no importance to the nature.

Thank you, Tirloque, you are one among millions. 

Link to comment

Well in matter of expressing yourself you are one among the billions then. ;)

 

I have read a chapter or two of Devil goes on Hollywood, but even if the themes are interesting, I might have preferred to see those debates take place in a story which has other strengths to rely on than just comics almost entirely filled with it. In depth discussions are worth it, but maybe shouldn't be the sole interest considering the public's search of entertainment. But I'm just an average reader, and it's just a point of view. 

 

Thanks for having answered, Rose66. :)

Link to comment

Well in matter of expressing yourself you are one among the billions then. ;)

 

I have read a chapter or two of Devil goes on Hollywood, but even if the themes are interesting, I might have preferred to see those debates take place in a story which has other strengths to rely on than just comics almost entirely filled with it. In depth discussions are worth it, but maybe shouldn't be the sole interest considering the public's search of entertainment. But I'm just an average reader, and it's just a point of view. 

 

Thanks for having answered, Rose66. :)

Yeah, it's a situation even funny, the stories 'should be in Oxford, and not necessarily in LoversLab..' :)... and indeed, they are, the Vatican has been one of the grand readers....   The entertainment carries a cross in the backs. The volume bothers a little, but he'll be necessary more ahead. For this, the critics are accepted, just as the compliments. But's something that was already said, it's being talked about the distaste, for this the pleasure did not appeared yet. But he'll come in grand style :)

Thank you once more :)

Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use