Scow2 Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 I for one want more "Human on Animal" beastialty options - not only for rape, but also consensual sex (If that druid mod gets off the ground like I hope it does!) Maybe a normal human is no match for a troll, sabercat, or werewolf... Unfortunately, I am the high king of Skyrim... but my character is the Dhovakin, DRAGONBORN, and he(And she) should have the strength to force him/herself on anything (s)he has the power to defeat.
Militus Posted January 23, 2014 Author Posted January 23, 2014 I for one want more "Human on Animal" beastialty options - not only for rape, but also consensual sex (If that druid mod gets off the ground like I hope it does!) Maybe a normal human is no match for a troll, sabercat, or werewolf... Unfortunately, I am the high king of Skyrim... but my character is the Dhovakin, DRAGONBORN, and he(And she) should have the strength to force him/herself on anything (s)he has the power to defeat. Love it! I dig the Flame Atronach/Female Draugr/Spriggan part, not the "male fucking a dog" stuff. Isn't there any way to add those three monster races to the allowed faction for the animations ? I mean come on, they're pretty much humanoid, don't need any specific animation since all we need already exists, and everyone must've thought about banging one while playing as a male character. This^
Militus Posted January 28, 2014 Author Posted January 28, 2014 I'm afraid I'll have to shamelessly bump this.
tase Posted January 28, 2014 Posted January 28, 2014 Wasn't there a Spriggan remesh/retexture that made her sexy ? Or am I thinking Oblivion again ?
Militus Posted February 3, 2014 Author Posted February 3, 2014 Don't Draugr have the same skeleton as humans?
Sweatington Posted February 4, 2014 Posted February 4, 2014 " In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. " Wait, what!? Is this true!? for reals!? hahahahaha, that is so awesome and brilliant!
Militus Posted February 5, 2014 Author Posted February 5, 2014 Yeah it is, then again in Medieval times there wasn't nessesarily an age for sex either. Alot of things were different.But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then.
Militus Posted February 5, 2014 Author Posted February 5, 2014 http://rule34-data-003.paheal.net/_images/9778941443441085558eb5de48b39e48/1288464%20-%20Nord%20Quick_E%20Skyrim%20The_Elder_Scrolls%20animated%20flame_atronach%20source_filmmaker.gifHah!
Militus Posted February 19, 2014 Author Posted February 19, 2014 Guess there's just not enough support for women-loving.. I'll stop bumping it then.
Militus Posted April 10, 2014 Author Posted April 10, 2014 http://rule34-data-002.paheal.net/_images/ed1c09eb34a7397d91a19a86e244f749/807202%20-%20Oniontrain%20Skyrim%20The_Elder_Scrolls%20draugr.JPG Just throwing it out there! xP
Daycrist Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 http://rule34-data-003.paheal.net/_images/9778941443441085558eb5de48b39e48/1288464%20-%20Nord%20Quick_E%20Skyrim%20The_Elder_Scrolls%20animated%20flame_atronach%20source_filmmaker.gif Hah! Farkas: Hey Vilkas I found this sexy lithe flame atronarch while I was doing my latest job........but now it burns when I pee should I be worried?
afa Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Banging a Spriggan sounds like it'll lead a horrible splinter accident. As for Flame Atronach I hope you are high enough in smithing, enchanting, and alchemy to craft some high quality fire resist condoms.
Daycrist Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Banging a Spriggan sounds like it'll lead a horrible splinter accident. As for Flame Atronach I hope you are high enough in smithing, enchanting, and alchemy to craft some high quality fire resist condoms. Pshhh I'll just leave my boots of Fire Resist on....I'll be fine
Militus Posted June 29, 2014 Author Posted June 29, 2014 http://www.naughtymachinima.com/video/9777/skyrim-werewolves-orcs-and-atronachs Another lovely example..
therealkarlsquell Posted July 20, 2014 Posted July 20, 2014 Yeah it is, then again in Medieval times there wasn't nessesarily an age for sex either. Alot of things were different. But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then. " In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. " Wait, what!? Is this true!? for reals!? hahahahaha, that is so awesome and brilliant! In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. While this again goes for animals being dominant, I think top guys (who like to do the fucking,clearly) should also be able to be humping. I'm sure there's some form of female werewolf out there that can be humped, things like that. Boy i really dont know where or whom you got these informations from but whatever never believe in anything that comes from that source ever again. EVER. No discussion just believe me.
Eryneth Posted August 18, 2014 Posted August 18, 2014 First of all: Nobody needs to explain themself because of their fetish, so don't worry. I needed to quote this and vote this as the LL moto
Eryneth Posted August 18, 2014 Posted August 18, 2014 Yeah it is, then again in Medieval times there wasn't nessesarily an age for sex either. Alot of things were different. But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then. " In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. " Wait, what!? Is this true!? for reals!? hahahahaha, that is so awesome and brilliant! In Medieval times women would often lay with animals when their husbands were off to war or so, as it wasn't considered cheating when it was with an animal. While this again goes for animals being dominant, I think top guys (who like to do the fucking,clearly) should also be able to be humping. I'm sure there's some form of female werewolf out there that can be humped, things like that. Boy i really dont know where or whom you got these informations from but whatever never believe in anything that comes from that source ever again. EVER. No discussion just believe me. How about we don't "just believe you".... Pfft... "No discussion" = no proof. "The practice of bestiality was most widely accepted during the Middle Ages (476 AD to 1492 AD) due to the low level of acceptance of the Christian church in Western society (Miletski, 2006)" https://inpress.lib.uiowa.edu/feminae/DetailsPage.aspx?Feminae_ID=9713 Heres another few books you might like to read: Pierre Payer, "Sex and the Penitentials" Vern Bullough, "Sexual Practices and the Medieval Church" Uta Ranke-Heinemann, "Eunuchs for Heaven" Bestiality was generally accepted in areas until the introduction of the Christian church, in rural areas in that particular time it would have been quite prevalent but more accepted than todays society with rural society back then still having Druidic and Pagan views, in particular nature worship. If you don't want to enter into a discussion on something don't walk into a thread, crap all over a statement that someone has made and then claim that everyone should "just believe you".
Kelinas Posted August 28, 2015 Posted August 28, 2015 If you're looking for mods where you take a more dominating role in the nature, can't go wrong with Untamed, really. You basically turn into a one woman apocalypse after humping your way through the various animals. I'm not sure if you get anything special beyond Untamed levels when it comes to the less animal animals like Atronochs or Draugr or Giants and so on, but the main thematics is focused on wolves, saber cats, bears and so on.
Cranky Cat Posted August 28, 2015 Posted August 28, 2015 I like dominant female anything personally. There will be nothing but snowstorms until The Dragonborn gradually brings back Spring by letting every spriggan have her way with him! :-p You'll need to be absolutely immune to fire to survive the upcoming trials! Fortunately, I know a lonely fire atronach who is willing to deal...
therealkarlsquell Posted August 31, 2015 Posted August 31, 2015 But yeah, it wasn't wrong in the eyes of god or the church then. First sorry if my english isnt fit for these kind of posts, might switch to german for single words or phrases i am unable to express in english. I was just refering to this statement. With a little basic understanding of christian sexual morality u have to know that this aint true .... cant be true. Thats why i rigourosly said its beyond the boarder where a discussion of anykind seems usefull. ow about we don't "just believe you".... Pfft... "No discussion" = no proof. "The practice of bestiality was most widely accepted during the Middle Ages (476 AD to 1492 AD) due to the low level of acceptance of the Christian church in Western society (Miletski, 2006)" https://inpress.lib....Feminae_ID=9713 Heres another few books you might like to read: Pierre Payer, "Sex and the Penitentials" Vern Bullough, "Sexual Practices and the Medieval Church" Uta Ranke-Heinemann, "Eunuchs for Heaven" Bestiality was generally accepted in areas until the introduction of the Christian church, in rural areas in that particular time it would have been quite prevalent but more accepted than todays society with rural society back then still having Druidic and Pagan views, in particular nature worship. So now to the books u are putting forward to underline the statement that bestiality of any kind was acceptable in terms of christian sexual morality. I cant find anything on Miletski so i am unable to comment on her, but the statement itself seems odd: it was commonly accepted because chritian church wassnt widely accepted? Do i read this right? Well if so, its again beyond the point any discussion of this theory would make sense .... if not pls enlight me what she meant by this. The book u linked states itself that bestiality was "belegt" with death sentence by the time of the 13th century. All she claims there is that ancients had a laisse fair attitude towards this and can only explain that she is referring to pre medieval times here. I actually happen to know the Payer book and dont remember he is putting forward any argument stating that human-animal intercourse would have been acceptable in medieval. I actually dont remember he had bestiallity on its table anyhow. But as he is reffering to "Bußbüchern" anything he might have been writing about bestiality might have been reffering to the canonic laws given on the "Synode in Ankara (damals Sebaste)" about 320 where bestiallity was concidered a punishable crime (pre medieval). Actually the Book of Vern Bullough is completely on my line of argumentation, yet again on various places stating, that sexuality that where not for the purposes of procrastination where considered sinfull in general. Plus stating that bestialic intercourse was often associated with herasy and witchery. Didnt find anything for Heinemann. If you don't want to enter into a discussion on something don't walk into a thread, crap all over a statement that someone has made and then claim that everyone should "just believe you". As i said the statement was beyond the boarder it is usefull for a discussion (quite like the one who said the medieval invented like 300 years wich had never really happened) and anyone who had just the most basic knowledge of christian sexual moral would ve known this on the first glance. So i didnt mean to crap over someones statement, i just warned him to take serious the sources where he had that from, because he obv. doesnt have such knowledge (which istn any sort of offense) and is therefore an easy victim for such "unhaltbare" Statements.
Militus Posted April 1, 2016 Author Posted April 1, 2016 Boy I just noticed this.. You really have a way of taking things related to thread away from it for argument take, eh?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.