Red Garnet Posted October 9, 2015 Posted October 9, 2015 There is a mod like RandomSex that allows sex between npc that are only inside their house or only with a bed? the RandomSex bed's option seems not work with the 1.60 alpha2
Guest Posted October 9, 2015 Posted October 9, 2015 A new mod is being developed. It will replace the old "Oral Only" and will allow to configure pretty much any type or rule to have random sex and on request sex. The development is progressing fast, but it is not yet completed.
Red Garnet Posted October 10, 2015 Author Posted October 10, 2015 A new mod is being developed. It will replace the old "Oral Only" and will allow to configure pretty much any type or rule to have random sex and on request sex. The development is progressing fast, but it is not yet completed. Great!
Bobobo Posted October 10, 2015 Posted October 10, 2015 i think with lover's comfort, you can use an option that makes NPC who are registered as a couple in game have sex when the go to bed at home... you can even toggle incestuous relationships (for exemple Erikur and his sister in solitude) if i remember correctly, they will only have sex at home before they go to bed with this
Guest Posted October 10, 2015 Posted October 10, 2015 Great! On the new mod that is being developed (Scent of Sex the author is me), you can define pretty much any possible rule to have sex (target, source, collaborator, aggressiveness, filter on tags, filter on races, kind of actors (Player, Followers, NPCs, Creatures (both male, females, and generic))). And the "bed" thing give me an idea to also add an option for beds (never, only if available in range, always). Thank you for giving me this extra idea that I will implement.
Yuni Posted October 10, 2015 Posted October 10, 2015 A new mod is being developed. It will replace the old "Oral Only" and will allow to configure pretty much any type or rule to have random sex and on request sex. The development is progressing fast, but it is not yet completed. Oooh, thank you. That sounds wonderful. That's why I was so yippy on trying to get Oral Only fixed. =D I loved all the features... but by far my favorite was them asking, then raping me if I refused. I love giving or refusing consent, odd as that sounds. Thank you for your hard work, Hun. I know I can pester. Edit: Of course, being able to do the tag filtering was wonderful too.
Guest Posted October 10, 2015 Posted October 10, 2015 Oooh, thank you. That sounds wonderful. That's why I was so yippy on trying to get Oral Only fixed. =D I loved all the features... but by far my favorite was them asking, then raping me if I refused. I love giving or refusing consent, odd as that sounds. Thank you for your hard work, Hun. I know I can pester. Edit: Of course, being able to do the tag filtering was wonderful too. Thanks. In the new mod is already possible to decide if you want, in case of refusal, to have an aggressive animation to be chosen and played. With different levels of probability.
captainzoltar Posted October 13, 2015 Posted October 13, 2015 Great! On the new mod that is being developed (Scent of Sex the author is me), you can define pretty much any possible rule to have sex (target, source, collaborator, aggressiveness, filter on tags, filter on races, kind of actors (Player, Followers, NPCs, Creatures (both male, females, and generic))). And the "bed" thing give me an idea to also add an option for beds (never, only if available in range, always). Thank you for giving me this extra idea that I will implement. this sounds good cant wait for this.
Guest Posted October 14, 2015 Posted October 14, 2015 this sounds good cant wait for this. The development of the new mod is progressing well. The MCM menu is completed You can define the rules in a way you probably never saw using the MCM (SkyUI 5.1 is required.) The execution of rules is working but there are a bunch of errors to be fixed. I am on it. 5 people are helping on testing (someone more, someone less), and I really thank these guys for the help they are providing.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.