Tigerolsen Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 Hey all, this is my first post in this forum but I've been pokin around a lot. My request is to make some of the piercing sets available use the same scripts as the DD soulgem piercings, so you can't uneqiup them that easily and they can't be removed by other events that would normally unequip them (Cursed Loot for example - if it tries to equip a piercing from DD over a non-DD piercing and removes the latter) I haven't found any mod that does this and I would be really happy if someone made one that does this. Thanks in advance
threeddd33 Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 Hey all, this is my first post in this forum but I've been pokin around a lot. My request is to make some of the piercing sets available use the same scripts as the DD soulgem piercings, so you can't uneqiup them that easily and they can't be removed by other events that would normally unequip them (Cursed Loot for example - if it tries to equip a piercing from DD over a non-DD piercing and removes the latter) I haven't found any mod that does this and I would be really happy if someone made one that does this. Thanks in advance That could be kind of cool. You could have tongue, clit, etc piercings and each of them could have a different deviant magic.
emily1673 Posted January 30, 2016 Posted January 30, 2016 Currently I am working on a Immersive Piercing mod, and I eventually plan to include some of the features you mentioned, in particular the part "you can't uneqiup them that easily and they can't be removed by other events that would normally unequip them". At this time, it is already fully functional for earlobe piercings. Other piercing slots will be added later. A challenge is that there are many piercing mods around, and the piercings randomly use various item slots.
Tigerolsen Posted January 30, 2016 Author Posted January 30, 2016 That's really cool, your mod looks really promising in that regard, thank you!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.