lord of the fallen 2023 adult mods request

[xlegendgame]

unreal engine 5 game game like elden ring need some lewd armor and a nudes mods

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1501750/Lords_of_the_Fallen/

 

[Gigabash]

yeah definitely need skimpy outfit and better female model cuz damn that's meh

[StingerDef]

Yes, definitely the right female version in beautiful armor

[AB01]

+1 Hoping to see those glued undergarments removed  \ nude mod for both male and female character (like how Conan exiles and BG3 has without mod)

[Gigabash]

i don't think it will ever happen for this game most of the mods out there are about balancing the jank lol

[_DingleBerry_]

I've got some bad news, I did some digging and I was able to extract the female base model. There are actually breasts under the model's chest wrappings, and the texture even includes nipples. Unfortunately there isn't anything under the shorts, in fact they are connected to the rest of the body as one singular piece. You can see from one of the images I've attached that if you remove one of the vertices on the shorts there's nothing underneath. So a topless mod theoretically wouldn't be too much of a challenge but probably not a full nude mod without a bit of modelling work. Likewise, the base texture would have to be heavily altered as well since it also includes the texture for the shorts embedded within it. It's not impossible, just not as simple as making the clothes disappear and then texturing in a pussy.

Spoiler

Edited January 9, 2024 by _DingleBerry_

[jmedia7]

The issue with this game is that using pak files to replace assets just doesnt work with this game. You have to make a mod actor with UE4SS to replace assets. Not sure how that works though. 

[AllenHAnon]

On 1/9/2024 at 2:25 AM, _DingleBerry_ said:

I've got some bad news, I did some digging and I was able to extract the female base model. There are actually breasts under the model's chest wrappings, and the texture even includes nipples. Unfortunately there isn't anything under the shorts, in fact they are connected to the rest of the body as one singular piece. You can see from one of the images I've attached that if you remove one of the vertices on the shorts there's nothing underneath. So a topless mod theoretically wouldn't be too much of a challenge but probably not a full nude mod without a bit of modelling work. Likewise, the base texture would have to be heavily altered as well since it also includes the texture for the shorts embedded within it. It's not impossible, just not as simple as making the clothes disappear and then texturing in a pussy.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Any chance of that topless mod being made?

[_DingleBerry_]

On 1/31/2024 at 11:32 PM, AllenHAnon said:

 

Any chance of that topless mod being made?

 

Not by me, if it were fully nude sure but the female models aren't exactly the prettiest so the effort to make a topless mod just doesn't seem worth it in my opinion. It's also an Unreal 5 project which may make it more difficult to mod at the moment.

[AllenHAnon]

9 hours ago, _DingleBerry_ said:

 

Not by me, if it were fully nude sure but the female models aren't exactly the prettiest so the effort to make a topless mod just doesn't seem worth it in my opinion. It's also an Unreal 5 project which may make it more difficult to mod at the moment.

 

Dang. All right. That's fair. I appreciate the response.

[Gigabash]

Game not really popular anyway its better than the original but still forgettable

[rafal112]

 

[AllenHAnon]

On 2/3/2024 at 12:40 PM, DoctorDementor said:

Game not really popular anyway its better than the original but still forgettable

I have to be honest... I'm confused as to why. Admittedly, I never played the original (never even heard of it until I started playing the new one), but I'm on my second playthrough and I rather love it. Yes, it keeps getting updated and yes, there are definitely bugs. But I guess I'm a forgiving person? Their updates come along with what is basically free DLC and I think they have the potential of an awesome game, here.

 

Don't get me wrong... Cyberpunk 2077 is, at least currently, a far superior game, but given where that one started, that's why I'm a bit forgiving. I'm not saying that LotF has the potential to be as good as, or better than CP2077, but,,, like... I'm already enjoying it, and to me that means it can only get better from here,,, at least for me.

 

I've read the Steam reviews and such and, honestly, aside from the bugs, I don't really understand the complaints. In fact I find them baffling. And sure, the character creator could be better, but I've also seen and experienced way worse. This game is underrated and deserves way more love than it's getting right now.

[_DingleBerry_]

4 hours ago, AllenHAnon said:

I have to be honest... I'm confused as to why. Admittedly, I never played the original (never even heard of it until I started playing the new one), but I'm on my second playthrough and I rather love it. Yes, it keeps getting updated and yes, there are definitely bugs. But I guess I'm a forgiving person? Their updates come along with what is basically free DLC and I think they have the potential of an awesome game, here.

 

Don't get me wrong... Cyberpunk 2077 is, at least currently, a far superior game, but given where that one started, that's why I'm a bit forgiving. I'm not saying that LotF has the potential to be as good as, or better than CP2077, but,,, like... I'm already enjoying it, and to me that means it can only get better from here,,, at least for me.

 

I've read the Steam reviews and such and, honestly, aside from the bugs, I don't really understand the complaints. In fact I find them baffling. And sure, the character creator could be better, but I've also seen and experienced way worse. This game is underrated and deserves way more love than it's getting right now.

 

I beat it when it first came out and defeated every boss except for the boss you fight to get the Umbral ending. I know they've been tweaking it since launch which is great, but my first play through was very polarizing. I think the worst part of the game was the mobs, which made the game really annoying to play. It was made worse by a massive aggro range and ranged enemies being able to snipe you from across the map. Controls were also floaty and a bit awkward, I died to rolling off an edge just as much as I died from an enemy. And needing to Soulflay things within the environment to traverse the map was especially frustrating when you're being swarmed by a bunch of spastic enemies. The levels were also very confusing to navigate and each one was just a slog to get through. Most of the environments outside of the convent weren't very unique or memorable. Overall it just seemed like the devs were trying to ape FromSoftware without fully understanding why their games are so good. I did enjoy a lot of the game, but it felt like all of its flaws ended up canceling out all the fun I had to make it a net neutral experience. Just like Lies of P, which was a very beautiful game, but it didn't seem to understand what made Bloodborne and Sekiro really good and just ended up being too frustrating to be considered great.

[AllenHAnon]

1 hour ago, _DingleBerry_ said:

 

I beat it when it first came out and defeated every boss except for the boss you fight to get the Umbral ending. I know they've been tweaking it since launch which is great, but my first play through was very polarizing. I think the worst part of the game was the mobs, which made the game really annoying to play. It was made worse by a massive aggro range and ranged enemies being able to snipe you from across the map. Controls were also floaty and a bit awkward, I died to rolling off an edge just as much as I died from an enemy. And needing to Soulflay things within the environment to traverse the map was especially frustrating when you're being swarmed by a bunch of spastic enemies. The levels were also very confusing to navigate and each one was just a slog to get through. Most of the environments outside of the convent weren't very unique or memorable. Overall it just seemed like the devs were trying to ape FromSoftware without fully understanding why their games are so good. I did enjoy a lot of the game, but it felt like all of its flaws ended up canceling out all the fun I had to make it a net neutral experience. Just like Lies of P, which was a very beautiful game, but it didn't seem to understand what made Bloodborne and Sekiro really good and just ended up being too frustrating to be considered great.

 

I'm thinking a lot of that stuff was fixed? I don't get swarmed all that often, TBH.

Lies of P must have been fixed, as well, because I also found that to be an enjoyable game.

 

But I get what you're saying. I didn't play LotF when it first dropped. It had several fixes and updates before I finally started playing it...

[Gigabash]

On 2/5/2024 at 7:03 PM, AllenHAnon said:

I have to be honest... I'm confused as to why. Admittedly, I never played the original (never even heard of it until I started playing the new one), but I'm on my second playthrough and I rather love it. Yes, it keeps getting updated and yes, there are definitely bugs. But I guess I'm a forgiving person? Their updates come along with what is basically free DLC and I think they have the potential of an awesome game, here.

 

Don't get me wrong... Cyberpunk 2077 is, at least currently, a far superior game, but given where that one started, that's why I'm a bit forgiving. I'm not saying that LotF has the potential to be as good as, or better than CP2077, but,,, like... I'm already enjoying it, and to me that means it can only get better from here,,, at least for me.

 

I've read the Steam reviews and such and, honestly, aside from the bugs, I don't really understand the complaints. In fact I find them baffling. And sure, the character creator could be better, but I've also seen and experienced way worse. This game is underrated and deserves way more love than it's getting right now.

The first mistake was trying to reboot and use the name of a game that was by himself forgettable their marketing was all over the place they wanted to target new players but in the same time bringing the barely existent fanbase of the first  one time they say its a reboot another time they say ''Not really a reboot but in the same universe'' another time its a re imagining another time its a ''semi sequel'' and then again going back to full reboot while keeping up the exact same name

Second mistake its OVERPRICED asking 59 buck for a buggy game (at launch) acting as a reboot of a failed forgotten game was not a smart move

the rest well the game is very mid its definitely not bad but nothing memorable compared to the concurrence if i had to sum it up it would be ''A soul like you play when you finished played all the better soul like of your library '' if the lord of fallen of today released at the time of the OG lord of fallen it would have been met with a bit more warmer welcome

[AllenHAnon]

On 2/11/2024 at 4:43 PM, DoctorDementor said:

The first mistake was trying to reboot and use the name of a game that was by himself forgettable their marketing was all over the place they wanted to target new players but in the same time bringing the barely existent fanbase of the first  one time they say its a reboot another time they say ''Not really a reboot but in the same universe'' another time its a re imagining another time its a ''semi sequel'' and then again going back to full reboot while keeping up the exact same name

Second mistake its OVERPRICED asking 59 buck for a buggy game (at launch) acting as a reboot of a failed forgotten game was not a smart move

the rest well the game is very mid its definitely not bad but nothing memorable compared to the concurrence if i had to sum it up it would be ''A soul like you play when you finished played all the better soul like of your library '' if the lord of fallen of today released at the time of the OG lord of fallen it would have been met with a bit more warmer welcome

 

To be entirely fair, I missed all that. I honestly didn't know about either Lords of the Fallen until well after the 2023 had released. I bought it on a whim because I'm very interested in more Souls and Soulslike games since playing Elden Ring, and Steam recommended it to me. I also apparently paid $48.99 (USD) for it, and I genuinely don't feel like that was a waste. So I'm coming to it with no prior knowledge, after several patches. Maybe that's why I have more positive feelings for it. The game doesn't have any of that baggage for me.

Anyways...
 

Spoiler

 

On 2/4/2024 at 3:49 AM, rafal112 said:

 

 

Not bad, but the fact that I can't use any chest pieces is kind of annoying. Given the fact that the bra can just be removed, a mod that just does that without requiring reshade or blocking my PC from putting on a top would be nice.

Maybe I should commission it... but I'd have to budget... not a lot of money... hmm...

ETA... you know what, though? The prudishness of a studio that made a game rated M for Mature is pretty hilarious. The fact that not only is the underwear part of the model, but it matches the skin color is both hilarious and kind of sad...

Edited April 3, 2024 by AllenHAnon

[AB01]

Really hate this type of effing forced underwear censorship . This is why devs should add official nudity toggle like how Conan exiles has if games like this never gets proper modding support to remove those freaking forced underwear on player character

 

[_DingleBerry_]

15 hours ago, AB01 said:

Really hate this type of effing forced underwear censorship . This is why devs should add official nudity toggle like how Conan exiles has if games like this never gets proper modding support to remove those freaking forced underwear on player character

 

 

The only problem is it takes some conscious effort to add genitals to a character mesh, and then on top of that you need to texture them. It probably doesn't take that much effort, but most developers see it as a risk to add graphic nudity even if it's optional. Adding the feature to toggle nudity needs to be implemented as well, it's not a lot of work, but it's still work that needs to be signed off on and weighed against other development work. So devs usually just decide not to do it.

 

It's common to find a "nude" barbie doll mesh with no genitals because modeling the entire body is often a necessity in order to accurately model clothing on top of it. Even meshes with missing geometry under their clothes or "permanent underwear" was probably at one point a full model that was completely nude. Developers only remove geometry as a way to optimize the game (not so much today with better and faster game engines) and to prevent the body mesh from clipping outside of the clothing. In the case a fully nude mesh is left in the game files, it's usually because that specific mesh is featured in various states of dress/undress and has a variety of outfits it uses, so it's just easier to leave it in and then hide whatever body parts are clothed. That's why you're more likely to find a nude mesh of the player character, because in any given game, the player character usually has the most outfit changes. I agree, it's stupid and it doesn't really take that much effort to make a mesh anatomically accurate, but this still requires that the dev team has a conversation about including it in the game. But the silver lining is that the devs still do enough of the work for modders to be able to easily pick up the slack and create a mostly canon nude mod.

[AllenHAnon]

On 5/29/2024 at 7:51 PM, _DingleBerry_ said:

 

The only problem is it takes some conscious effort to add genitals to a character mesh, and then on top of that you need to texture them. It probably doesn't take that much effort, but most developers see it as a risk to add graphic nudity even if it's optional. Adding the feature to toggle nudity needs to be implemented as well, it's not a lot of work, but it's still work that needs to be signed off on and weighed against other development work. So devs usually just decide not to do it.

 

It's common to find a "nude" barbie doll mesh with no genitals because modeling the entire body is often a necessity in order to accurately model clothing on top of it. Even meshes with missing geometry under their clothes or "permanent underwear" was probably at one point a full model that was completely nude. Developers only remove geometry as a way to optimize the game (not so much today with better and faster game engines) and to prevent the body mesh from clipping outside of the clothing. In the case a fully nude mesh is left in the game files, it's usually because that specific mesh is featured in various states of dress/undress and has a variety of outfits it uses, so it's just easier to leave it in and then hide whatever body parts are clothed. That's why you're more likely to find a nude mesh of the player character, because in any given game, the player character usually has the most outfit changes. I agree, it's stupid and it doesn't really take that much effort to make a mesh anatomically accurate, but this still requires that the dev team has a conversation about including it in the game. But the silver lining is that the devs still do enough of the work for modders to be able to easily pick up the slack and create a mostly canon nude mod.

 

How did you export the model from the game? And would you be able to add a short tutorial for removing the bra and making it into a mod for the game?

Edited June 4, 2024 by AllenHAnon

[_DingleBerry_]

7 hours ago, AllenHAnon said:

 

How did you export the model from the game? And would you be able to add a short tutorial for removing the bra and making it into a mod for the game?

 

I've never actually created a full mod for Unreal but there are a lot of tutorials that can help you learn. For starters, I believe it involves downloading the specific version of Unreal that was used to make the game.

 

You can find  out what the Unreal version is by going to the main folder of the game where the "content" folder is -> go to binaries -> Win64 -> And right click the .exe file in that folder -> properties -> the Unreal version will be listed as the file version.

 

As for getting the model and textures from the game. You need an updated version of Umodel that supports Unreal engine 5 since that is what Lords of the Fallen runs on. You also may need an AES key to access what's in the .pak files. Gildor's forums should have everything you need including a list of all the AES keys for every game. Once you have those you will use Umodel to find the meshes and textures you want, once you find them you can right click and extract. You'll want to extract them as .glTF and .png, which you can specify in the settings. As for actually "removing" the bra, you may be able to remove the bra mesh using blender, or you could hide the bra by making the texture for it invisible (using a transparent .png). Although I'm not sure which is easier. Again, I'm not an Unreal modding expert.

 

If you really want it done it could be quicker to commission a modder, they may even be able to make the mod fully nude. The problem is jmedia7 already pointed out that modding this specific game is not as simple as replacing .pak files so it might require finding someone with specialized knowledge.

Edited June 5, 2024 by _DingleBerry_

[AB01]

Right , damn

[AllenHAnon]

On 6/19/2024 at 2:52 AM, AB01 said:

Right , damn

 

Yeah... and I was planning on saving up to commission one, too, but then I lost my job. Plus, I wouldn't even know who to commission.

 

Honestly, I'd cope with the underwear thing just to have a topless female PC mod. But if they manage to get the underwear taken care of, as well, that'd be even better.

[_DingleBerry_]

 

On 6/20/2024 at 1:38 PM, AllenHAnon said:

 

Yeah... and I was planning on saving up to commission one, too, but then I lost my job. Plus, I wouldn't even know who to commission.

 

Honestly, I'd cope with the underwear thing just to have a topless female PC mod. But if they manage to get the underwear taken care of, as well, that'd be even better.

 

On 1/9/2024 at 2:44 AM, jmedia7 said:

The issue with this game is that using pak files to replace assets just doesnt work with this game. You have to make a mod actor with UE4SS to replace assets. Not sure how that works though. 

 

jmedia7 seemed to imply it might be possible but there are currently some barriers and you would need to know how to use UE4SS. If you negotiate with him he may be willing to learn how to make it happen, or maybe at least point you to someone else who can. But sorry to hear about the job, I know what that's like. The mod can wait and is hardly important compared to taking care of that.

 

[Tuxner]

On 6/4/2024 at 7:40 PM, AllenHAnon said:

 

And would you be able to add a short tutorial for removing the bra and making it into a mod for the game?

 

That's actually pretty easy and requires no mod / modding skills.

 

* Uninstall EasyAnticheat (at least Gamepass-Version has a UninstallAntiCheat.bat in the install folder)

* Install Reshade with full addon support (https://reshade.me/#download)

(If you are using Gamepass, delete the LOTF2.exe to trash. Then copy the exe from trash to desktop. Then back to gamefolder. No idea why, but now you can select the exe in Reshade)

Select DX10/11/12

No Need to install any shaders

* Install Shader-Toggler

https://framedsc.com/ReshadeGuides/Addons/shader_toggler_repository.htm

(Basically put theShaderToggler.addon64 in same folder as LOTF2.exe)

 

That's it? Last link also contains tutorial how to remove any shader / mesh from almost any game.

 

Basically, start the game, make sure your character is visible.

HOME should open Reshade menu. Navigate to Addons and Shader Toggle. Create a new Toggle Group. Press Edit and set a toggle-shortcut.

Press "Change Shader". Wait ~2 seconds.

Press Num-2 up to ~200 times (till bra disappears). Press Num-3.

"Save all Toggle groups"