Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Will we be seeing any femdoms who aren't dressed in skimpy armor?  Only time will tell :3

"Skimpiness" is definitively essential with men being naturally visual creatures....... its the most effective means or the only means for women to control, don't you agree?  :blush:

Link to comment

 

Will we be seeing any femdoms who aren't dressed in skimpy armor?  Only time will tell :3

"Skimpiness" is definitively essential with men being naturally visual creatures....... its the most effective means or the only means for women to control, don't you agree?  :blush:

 

 

Nope. Being in charge does not require the woman to be basically nude. In fact that works against her authority, just like being nude also works against the authority of a man.

Link to comment

 

Will we be seeing any femdoms who aren't dressed in skimpy armor?  Only time will tell :3

"Skimpiness" is definitively essential with men being naturally visual creatures....... its the most effective means or the only means for women to control, don't you agree?  :blush:

 

 It might be true that most blokes are primarily visual, but you only have to look at all the geeky "unboxing" videos on YT to know they really like unwrapping things.

 

Men soon lose interest if you offer everything on a plate, a wise woman quickly learns to practice the art of mystery, like a squirt of perfume in the air whenever a bloke wanders by your work station ;)

Link to comment

 

 

Will we be seeing any femdoms who aren't dressed in skimpy armor?  Only time will tell :3

"Skimpiness" is definitively essential with men being naturally visual creatures....... its the most effective means or the only means for women to control, don't you agree?  :blush:

 

 

Nope. Being in charge does not require the woman to be basically nude. In fact that works against her authority, just like being nude also works against the authority of a man.

 

Are you suggesting that Tarzan isn't king of the jungle because of his revealing loincloth? Does Conan not rule as a consequence of his proud display of his powerful physique? Did anyone (in world) not take Doctor Manhattan seriously in his field because he didn't wear a lab coat or anything else?

 

To use real life examples, prize fighters,mixed martial artists and rebel warlords aren't undermined by their revealing attire in the slightest. Most people are more worried about those folks wearing their opponents' blood on their hands than stress over what they aren't wearing over their torsos or their arms and legs.

 

There is one major thing that these female characters are lacking that their similarly dressed male counterparts have--muscle. It is fantasy but it might help to sell it a bit better if they look as if they can dominate a man or as if they can fight off any unwanted advances without outside assistance and with minimal effort.

These gals don't look like they can make anyone change their minds let alone bring them to heel.

Link to comment

 

 

 

Will we be seeing any femdoms who aren't dressed in skimpy armor?  Only time will tell :3

"Skimpiness" is definitively essential with men being naturally visual creatures....... its the most effective means or the only means for women to control, don't you agree?  :blush:

 

 

Nope. Being in charge does not require the woman to be basically nude. In fact that works against her authority, just like being nude also works against the authority of a man.

 

Are you suggesting that Tarzan isn't king of the jungle because of his revealing loincloth? Does Conan not rule as a consequence of his proud display of his powerful physique? Did anyone (in world) not take Doctor Manhattan seriously in his field because he didn't wear a lab coat or anything else?

 

To use real life examples, prize fighters,mixed martial artists and rebel warlords aren't undermined by their revealing attire in the slightest. Most people are more worried about those folks wearing their opponents' blood on their hands than stress over what they aren't wearing over their torsos or their arms and legs.

 

There is one major thing that these female characters are lacking that their similarly dressed male counterparts have--muscle. It is fantasy but it might help to sell it a bit better if they look as if they can dominate a man or as if they can fight off any unwanted advances without outside assistance and with minimal effort.

These gals don't look like they can make anyone change their minds let alone bring them to heel.

 

 

hmmmm... interesting thing about muscles. I have no idea how to add muscles (muscled women? egad) Could we just suspend reality and say that the sight of near naked female warriors aided in weakening their male opponents will to fight? hehehehe..... it's just fantasy and eye candy stuff. Nothing serious like world peace.

 

 

Link to comment

 

 

 

 

Will we be seeing any femdoms who aren't dressed in skimpy armor?  Only time will tell :3

"Skimpiness" is definitively essential with men being naturally visual creatures....... its the most effective means or the only means for women to control, don't you agree?  :blush:

 

 

Nope. Being in charge does not require the woman to be basically nude. In fact that works against her authority, just like being nude also works against the authority of a man.

 

Are you suggesting that Tarzan isn't king of the jungle because of his revealing loincloth? Does Conan not rule as a consequence of his proud display of his powerful physique? Did anyone (in world) not take Doctor Manhattan seriously in his field because he didn't wear a lab coat or anything else?

 

To use real life examples, prize fighters,mixed martial artists and rebel warlords aren't undermined by their revealing attire in the slightest. Most people are more worried about those folks wearing their opponents' blood on their hands than stress over what they aren't wearing over their torsos or their arms and legs.

 

There is one major thing that these female characters are lacking that their similarly dressed male counterparts have--muscle. It is fantasy but it might help to sell it a bit better if they look as if they can dominate a man or as if they can fight off any unwanted advances without outside assistance and with minimal effort.

These gals don't look like they can make anyone change their minds let alone bring them to heel.

 

 

hmmmm... interesting thing about muscles. I have no idea how to add muscles (muscled women? egad) Could we just suspend reality and say that the sight of near naked female warriors aided in weakening their male opponents will to fight? hehehehe..... it's just fantasy and eye candy stuff. Nothing serious like world peace.

 

 

 

There is nothing that says that muscle can't be eyecandy. Millions of straight women and gay/bisexual men around the world can attest to that. It just makes for a much harder form of candy,more like a jawbreaker rather than chewy nougat.

 

Here are a few mods that add muscle to female characters that shouldn't compromise their aesthetic value. The operative word here is shouldn't.

 

Barbarian and Milkdrinker Skin UNP and UNPB-

http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/24318/?

Sporty Sexy Map-

http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/13377/?

 

There are multiple levels of hardness presented in the options of the Female Muscle Mod:

http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/44/?

This is the one which I would have to say "User beware." since some of the options are a bit extreme,even to the point where the traits might be considered unattractive by many viewers of male beefcake models.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...