Duchess_Gummybuns Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 A "thirteen" yearold?! Oh, my. Well, with what I was doing, I can't say much, no, anything at all. I voted -18 cause I'm not passed half of my 18th year... I felt like that was enough to bar me from the 18-25 prestige....
Cezul Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 ITT: Ashal secretly posts this poll to weed out all the under ages with the banhammer Just kidding. But seriously.
Duchess_Gummybuns Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Yeah! Arrow, going and putting a -18 choice. Making me feel like a child.... :'( It's ok. At least I know they can't kick me out of the Rubber BoB's and Cocks store!
Duchess_Gummybuns Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Oh wait! I'm 18.5 this month! WOOHOO! lol
arr0w Posted March 4, 2014 Author Posted March 4, 2014 ITT: Ashal secretly posts this poll to weed out all the under ages with the banhammer Just kidding. But seriously. LMFAO i like a joke but im not going to get the hammer of BAN <(statement in trevor's voice from halo matchmaking youtube series, seriiously, WATCH IT!!! ) by playing along xD hahahahah. But no. the -18 is because i cant remember what was specified about like well -17 lol. Considering this isnt JUST an adult site!!! Yeah! Arrow, going and putting a -18 choice. Making me feel like a child.... :'( It's ok. At least I know they can't kick me out of the Rubber BoB's and Cocks store!
BruceWayne Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Considering this isnt JUST an adult site!!! While there is non-adult or SFW content on this site, this site is strictly for adults only (18+).
Guest airdance Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Arrow, That light you see at the end of the tunnel is the headlamp of an oncoming train. Polls like this never seem to end well. But for the record 10 to 25 range.
Vancien Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 I'd be willing to surmise this post was made for more than just "curiosity".
Guest Mogie56 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Anyone spelling there name like Dark0ne won't get my vote. Arr0w
Guest xthejester Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 I'd be willing to surmise this post was made for more than just "curiosity". My thoughts as well.
Slammer64 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 I suspect a dataminer, or maybe law enforcement, but then again, I'm a paranoid old bastard.
arr0w Posted March 4, 2014 Author Posted March 4, 2014 Considering this isnt JUST an adult site!!! While there is non-adult or SFW content on this site, this site is strictly for adults only (18+). Okay i guess i could have checked the rules for sure before stating that, i just assumed that since it wasnt all ADULT that there MAY BE members that are close but not quite. Arrow, That light you see at the end of the tunnel is the headlamp of an oncoming train. Polls like this never seem to end well. But for the record 10 to 25 range. Ooo lights.. Pretty lights... ah well, it is what it is. I'd be willing to surmise this post was made for more than just "curiosity". Nah, honestly, i just put the -18 to cover all ranges. Im really curious as to how many members are of an older generation and so far, im pleasantly surprised!!! So yea, purely for curiosity. Anyone spelling there name like Dark0ne won't get my vote. Arr0w Ahh Dark0ne.. isn't he the naz-- guy over at nexus? Meh. Dont lump me in with him cause I go by AnArr0w27hekn33 on XBL and arr0w here. I used arr0w long before i ever heard of him. now, if i was going by Light0ne, well, different story I'd be willing to surmise this post was made for more than just "curiosity". My thoughts as well. and yes, while it would be really crafty for a mod or admin to make a post like this as a trap, that is not what my point was. But think what you want. reality really is dependent upon the observer isnt it? I suspect a dataminer, or maybe law enforcement, but then again, I'm a paranoid old bastard. Hahahah its alright, im a paranoid young man. And not law enforcement either hahaha thats a good one. im not a fan man xD
gvman3670 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 reality really is dependent upon the observer isnt it? I'm an old fart, kinda'. And as an old, experienced fella' I thought I'd do you a favor and point out a flaw in critical thinking here. Don't take it personal, OK? This is just the internet. Reality is in actuality just reality, regardless of who or what is observing it. You may sense some parts and not other parts, but that doesn't change what reality is or what it actually consists of. So your reality and my reality are the same thing as long as we're both inhabiting the same universe. The problem is that some aren't well equipped to sense reality or mentally capable of accepting it.
arr0w Posted March 4, 2014 Author Posted March 4, 2014 reality really is dependent upon the observer isnt it? I'm an old fart, kinda'. And as an old, experienced fella' I thought I'd do you a favor and point out a flaw in critical thinking here. Don't take it personal, OK? This is just the internet. Reality is in actuality just reality, regardless of who or what is observing it. You may sense some parts and not other parts, but that doesn't change what reality is or what it actually consists of. So your reality and my reality are the same thing as long as we're both inhabiting the same universe. The problem is that some aren't well equipped to sense reality or mentally capable of accepting it. You shouldnt get me started on reality and i shouldnt start, but fuck it lol. Above = not ENTIRELY true. We EXPECT our universe and reality to be consistent from person to person. But its usually not. Take the double slit experiment. Photon gun directed at a piece of materiel with two slits in it and a detector past that. Okay whatever, send a certain amount of photons through it, they hit like you'd expect. two lines, directly on the other side of the slits, leaving a marked pattern like this: | | Turn the gun on and come back later without watching/recording and the result looks like this: | | | | SO. Reality DEPENDS on WHO and IF there's an observer. If light and other particles CAN act differently depending on whether or not there is an observer, then we CANNOT say consistently, how or WHAT state reality is in. Yes, generally we can tell but not exactly. Same with subatomic particles. We can say an electron is between here| |and here but NOT that is right here| X | This just goes to show how strange reality really can be AND that we should not presume that it is ALWAYS the same. As an extension to this, time and space are now known to not even be consistent throughout the universe. How can an invisible force like gravity effect time, space, and reality? Theres another factor here for sure, but even as it, another example of how unpredictable reality is. Sorry for the rant, i DO like a good discussion of physics, i read wayyyyy too much
Guest Mogie56 Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 reality really is dependent upon the observer isnt it? I'm an old fart, kinda'. And as an old, experienced fella' I thought I'd do you a favor and point out a flaw in critical thinking here. Don't take it personal, OK? This is just the internet. Reality is in actuality just reality, regardless of who or what is observing it. You may sense some parts and not other parts, but that doesn't change what reality is or what it actually consists of. So your reality and my reality are the same thing as long as we're both inhabiting the same universe. The problem is that some aren't well equipped to sense reality or mentally capable of accepting it. In the words of "Tommy Chong" Wow man, that's deep @Arr0w btw when posting a poll try not to "try so hard". using (I'm purely curious) and (just out of curiosity) tends to send up warning flags as though your trying to hard to convince. it raises suspicions rather quickly. and my comment wasn't to lump you in with dork0ne only to show that it can lead to suspicion because of "trying to hard to convince". especially when you give no indication as to YOUR age.
Vancien Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 That isn't at all what I meant by my statement. Moderators or Administrators were the farthest thing from my thoughts. I do not believe they would hide behind a phony profile to accomplish some form of catching underage members by way of a poll. Nor do I feel offenders would be stupid enough to actually do it but.. I won't get into my thoughts on how kids think. The reason I surmise that this was made for more than just "curiosity" is because post polls like this are generally created with an outcome in mind. Such as; How many people think like me? So one can only assume, you had an objective in mind. Hence my statement. And being as it were that you included an age option that isn't even allowed here, I could only assume you are likely closer to that age as well and looking to find out perhaps how many people also fall into that category. Or perhaps, how many "do not". Anyway, don't you know it's rude to ask ladies their age? Best, Van
Guest xthejester Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Anyway, don't you know it's rude to ask ladies their age? I'm an incredibly rude fellow in that respect. Several others too, I suppose.
Guest Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 we are hitting the liege im 32 so i vote for 30,31 and above
arr0w Posted March 5, 2014 Author Posted March 5, 2014 Lol im 21. And not hiding it. Also, i didnt mean to start a thread for a certain outcome, i was just asking haha. But yes, i suppose i am closer to the younger range but not looking for anything. as i said, im more surprised by the higher ranges anyway
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.