Jump to content
  • entries
    9
  • comments
    62
  • views
    3,402

Part 1.7 - The meaning of being the hero


Cloen

806 views

Guess what? Still no Skyrim character, Dragon Age Inquisition is the culprit. I really want to finish this game and in truth today I'm writing because of this.
I didn't even finish the main storyline and BAM! right in the favourite game spot. This game is not perfect but it has a strange charm to it, it becomes inevitable to like it. My computer can't even handle it and I spent 10 hours in creating my character and choosing the class (I ended up "cheating" and creating my own class) but the feel it is giving me got me thinking.

 

warning: tl;dr this entry is a very confused mess I am going to use to help myself putting things together. Don't read it if you have something better to do

 


Ego

 

Untitled.png

 


Let's talk about Ego. So far I posted screenshots about her but as this blog is going I may sound like someone obsessed with this particular character and its somatic. It's not like that. There is a why, a really big one.
Let's start to say that Ego is not the actual name of the character, I don't call her like that, I simply refer her as "it". It's a title let's say. She has no particular name and I usually use random names. A name helps people define something or someone, it helps having a distinct picture of the character in it's complexity. If you think about it, if I gave her a name I should also create a background.

 

How do you have a character with no name, no background story, no particular interests, body and face? That's Ego.

 

It's about the soul of the writer, my soul, trying to use art to live out of my very own person, taking form in what I consider perfection. Ego is in fact an impersonification. She does everything I want her to do and says everything I want her to say.

 

..but again, why?
She plays as a character but she's not. She is a "meaning", the true meaning of being the protagonist of its own story.

 


Untitled2.png

 


I'm experienced enough as a writer to say that the limit when writing a story is that... there's no real limit. You can have a protagonist, more protagonists or no protagonist at all and yet continue in what you are doing: have the plot live, grow and at the end die. I'm experienced enough to also say that there's something giving energy to a story, without that a book would be a car with no motor: It's the artist's will. It's always there but you can't see it through the plot.

 


Untitled2.png

 


Some even say that artists should have nothing to do with their stories, they are just a hand holding a pen or smashing the keyboard buttons but they clearly know nothing about what they are talking about. Creators and creations are the same thing, they don't simply share a strong bound, they are made of the same stuff. They even have the same role: they both talk about each other.

 


Untitled3.png

 


Why am I saying this? It's hard to explain why I use the same character in every game, over and over. It's not just about dedication. To say it with simple words I have created countless characters with countless stories, I now need to "say" more with my alter ego. I can't play a character anymore, I have to play the hero. A character is not enough to start a story, a hero... that's another thing. What would Skyrim be without the Dragonborn? What would Dragon Age be without the Inquisitor? Or Morrowind without the Nerevarine?
I don't ask to be the savior of every world afterall but the reason every world is born

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

Interesting what proper lighting  can do to picture. :)

Ego is most beautiful in the last picture.

 

Just a note: I was a DA fan until Inquisitor came out. Than I got very disappointed, but I'm glad you like the game. I wish you will be able to get your back to working on Skyrim. So far, I loved what I saw. :)

Link to comment

Interesting is the word, nice piece of introspection behind the choice of a character.

 

I have half a dozen characters following me through the years. One of them was meant to impersonate myself in a different body... yet this difference impacted behaviour, and in the end her personality. So, even though they can be more than simple characters to us, for me « heroes » is not the word who defines them. Mine do not need to be heroes : they are what they are, and I love them for this. And the more I role-play them, the more I create stories with them (giving them a voice of their own is a big leap forward in a character completion IMO), the more defined they get. The more they're « she » or « he », and the less they're the initial « it » or « Ego ». :)

 

Come on, I'm curious to see at what extent you'll be able to recreate her in Skyrim ! :D

Link to comment

.

 

I agree but Hero is just a name, like the Nerevarine, the Champion, the Inquisitor. It's not about it's meaning, it's about what it represents.

What I'm trying to say is that Ego is too ethereal to give her a moral, a psychology, it would be overridden by mine.

To say it in one word Ego is "awareness", the awareness of being fictional and the awareness of using her as a bridge to connect me to different worlds.

 

Oscar Wilde said it better: "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth"

Without Ego I wouldn't be able to play a game and be myself, everything would fall in forced roleplay

Link to comment

Also next week you are going to see my new Skyrim character. I had to download a lot of mods and make them work together perfectly will take time. You will be amazed though, I promise

Link to comment

Oscar Wilde said it better: "Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth"

Without Ego I wouldn't be able to play a game and be myself, everything would fall in forced roleplay

Then Ego was what my characters were for me in the past. They just evolved into personalities of their own, with time (even if they still have a bit of me). Whereas, it is up to you if Ego will undergo or not a similar transformation. :)

 

And.. waiting for next week of course ! :D

Link to comment

That actually is the "final product". Her lack of character traits are not there for laziness but as I said they are part of the whole thing. Giving her a story, a voice, a personality would result in her being stuck in a single world, forced to be roleplayed and so imprisoned in the lack of self awareness. It would be as different as being a mere mortal and a God.

Afterall I created so many characters, so many "mere mortals", that I had the need to have something more to evolve my art. 

 

It would be fun to see how other's Ego would be like though, it's something I could ask to make in future entries.

Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use