Jump to content

All things Cyberpunk 2077 General Thread


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, eaterofspleens said:

So the cause of the issue is that the developers made a trivial change which doesn't harm anyone, and will have a negligible change to the game. And in response, people are exploding with impotent fury as if someone skinned and ate their cat. The correct response is an amused shrug at most, not outraged foot stamping. 

Nice gas lighting you got going on there.  Apply what you just said to the handful of woke assholes on Twitter who started this whole shit show.  If the game change is negligible then why did they demand it?  Instead of telling everyone else to get over it, tell THEM they should just shrug their shoulders and move on.  Yeah...It don't work that way does it?

 

A few Leftist Twitter toddlers demanding no genders is NOT a selling point for a game.  That stupid woke virtue signalling caused CDPR to lose customers; not attract new ones.  EA/Dice and Battlefield5; they pulled some ignorant woke bullshit and then attacked the people who questioned them...Aaaand the game tanked.  It was a PR disaster and executives lost their jobs.  CDPR needs a good dose of that.

Link to comment
53 minutes ago, Kendo 2 said:

Nice gas lighting you got going on there.  Apply what you just said to the handful of woke assholes on Twitter who started this whole shit show.  If the game change is negligible then why did they demand it?  Instead of telling everyone else to get over it, tell THEM they should just shrug their shoulders and move on.  Yeah...It don't work that way does it?

 

A few Leftist Twitter toddlers demanding no genders is NOT a selling point for a game.  That stupid woke virtue signalling caused CDPR to lose customers; not attract new ones.  EA/Dice and Battlefield5; they pulled some ignorant woke bullshit and then attacked the people who questioned them...Aaaand the game tanked.  It was a PR disaster and executives lost their jobs.  CDPR needs a good dose of that.

Well it's negligible to you or i, as it doesn't stop us playing the character we choose, or change the way we would play the game. Its not negligible to trans people as it lets them play as a character they identify with. Again, who is harmed here? Other people being included doesn't mean that you're being excluded.

Link to comment
47 minutes ago, eaterofspleens said:

Well it's negligible to you or i, as it doesn't stop us playing the character we choose, or change the way we would play the game. Its not negligible to trans people as it lets them play as a character they identify with. Again, who is harmed here? Other people being included doesn't mean that you're being excluded.

More gas lighting.  What trans people want is more important than what non-trans people want.  That's your stance, not mine.  And your stance is bullshit.  CDPR didn't have to remove all genders to placate some cunts on Twitter but they did and they're proud of it.  FUCK.THEM.

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Kendo 2 said:

More gas lighting.  What trans people want is more important than what non-trans people want.  That's your stance, not mine.  And your stance is bullshit.  CDPR didn't have to remove all genders to placate some cunts on Twitter but they did and they're proud of it.  FUCK.THEM.

Ok, again lets try this, what have you lost here - in what way have you lost out, in what way is this negative to anyone? I don't want gross trans people playing with my toys is a spiteful childs response, not a actual answer.

 

Also, gas-lighting doesn't mean what you seem to think. It's not someone disagreeing with you.

Link to comment
13 hours ago, eaterofspleens said:

Ok, again lets try this, what have you lost here - in what way have you lost out, in what way is this negative to anyone? I don't want gross trans people playing with my toys is a spiteful childs response, not a actual answer.

 

Also, gas-lighting doesn't mean what you seem to think. It's not someone disagreeing with you.

Gas lighting is me seeing something with my own eyes and you telling me 'That's not what you're seeing.'  THAT is gas lighting and that's exactly what you've been trying (and failing) to do.  And now you're using a straw man by saying that my argument is about 'gross' trans people playing a game so that your stance will somehow seem more valid.  You're also pretending that my pointed responses are somehow not responses.

The issue is CDPR removed ALL genders.  They excluded males and females, otherwise I'd be able to pick one during character generation.  THAT is what they did and THAT is the issue.  Did they include a 3rd gender?  NO, they removed two existing genders already programmed into the game and replaced them with a 3rd.  By being 'inclusive' CDPR excluded two groups of players.  That's what happened, there's interviews with the devs where they state what they did and why they did it.

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Kendo 2 said:

In context, this how this conversation went;

ME: The devs removed genders.

THE DEVS: We removed genders.

YOU: The devs did not remove genders.

They didn't, its right there in the quote above. It's not a matter of semantics, its a matter of basic logic. If you can choose either gender, how can they have removed gender? They changed a binary choice to more choices, they don't stop you picking from either gender, you can do that or or making a monty python style mashup. You're railing at a nonexistent issue.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, eaterofspleens said:

They didn't, its right there in the quote above. It's not a matter of semantics, its a matter of basic logic. If you can choose either gender, how can they have removed gender? They changed a binary choice to more choices, they don't stop you picking from either gender, you can do that or or making a monty python style mashup. You're railing at a nonexistent issue.

You are actually arguing about the same stuff with Kendo, using equation with the same sum.

M + F + (Creating Gender)  =  C.G + (M + F)

Fact is - High and Mighty CDPR used 1st formula at the beginning of the marketing but after the demand of media queen Anita Sarkeesian to remove gender from their game and hire her as a specialist making cybersexuals, or the game will flop right at the release with the abused power of feminism and queers. CDPR insta dropped their balls and used the 2nd formula deviating their original concept of beautiful 3P camera cutscenes.? Its right out there 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, eaterofspleens said:

They didn't, its right there in the quote above. It's not a matter of semantics, its a matter of basic logic. If you can choose either gender, how can they have removed gender? They changed a binary choice to more choices, they don't stop you picking from either gender, you can do that or or making a monty python style mashup. You're railing at a nonexistent issue.

CDPR removed the male and female options and replaced them with a genderless one where you choose a body type and voice.  Operative word there is REMOVED.  Facts are facts, the devs are proud of it, end of story.  No amount of Leftist mental gymnastics changes the facts or what the devs said.  It is what it is.  If you don't want to take the devs at their word (what I'm doing) then that's on YOU.  Go play your hard-headed semantics game with someone else.  You ain't gonna gain any ground on me because I've read the interviews.  You are dismissed.

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Kendo 2 said:

CDPR removed the male and female options and replaced them with a genderless one where you choose a body type and voice.  Operative word there is REMOVED.  Facts are facts, the devs are proud of it, end of story.  No amount of Leftist mental gymnastics changes the facts or what the devs said.  It is what it is.  If you don't want to take the devs at their word (what I'm doing) then that's on YOU.  Go play your hard-headed semantics game with someone else.  You ain't gonna gain any ground on me because I've read the interviews.  You are dismissed.

They've removed the option to play as male or female, although you can still play as male or female. Got it. 1+1=3. Understood now.

Link to comment
40 minutes ago, RomeoZero said:

You are actually arguing about the same stuff with Kendo, using equation with the same sum.

M + F + (Creating Gender)  =  C.G + (M + F)

Fact is - High and Mighty CDPR used 1st formula at the beginning of the marketing but after the demand of media queen Anita Sarkeesian to remove gender from their game and hire her as a specialist making cybersexuals, or the game will flop right at the release with the abused power of feminism and queers. CDPR insta dropped their balls and used the 2nd formula deviating their original concept of beautiful 3P camera cutscenes.? Its right out there 

And that's paranoid gibberish.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, RomeoZero said:

Apparently you don't understand your own semantics.?

So... "feminism and queers", that well known demographic that makes or breaks a video games sales, are going to cause this game to flop, a game incidentally by a company who previously made a mega hit starring a heterosexual male. Somehow... Yup, sorry but its gibberish. And what do third person cameras have to do with the price of milk?

 

Maybe its the jews, or something...

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, eaterofspleens said:

So... "feminism and queers", that well known demographic that makes or breaks a video games sales, are going to cause this game to flop, a game incidentally by a company who previously made a mega hit starring a heterosexual male. Somehow... Yup, sorry but its gibberish. And what do third person cameras have to do with the price of milk?

 

Maybe its the jews, or something...

No,its just that you do not read or see the news regarding the game industry and their game companies as some people do daily.The limit of information is your minus on the subject. 

Link to comment
17 hours ago, RomeoZero said:

You are actually arguing about the same stuff with Kendo, using equation with the same sum.

M + F + (Creating Gender)  =  C.G + (M + F)

Fact is - High and Mighty CDPR used 1st formula at the beginning of the marketing but after the demand of media queen Anita Sarkeesian to remove gender from their game and hire her as a specialist making cybersexuals, or the game will flop right at the release with the abused power of feminism and queers. CDPR insta dropped their balls and used the 2nd formula deviating their original concept of beautiful 3P camera cutscenes.? Its right out there 

Except none of that happened. She didn't get hired and sexual options are still in the game. Your fetish being dropped doesn't redefine what game is.

Link to comment
14 hours ago, RomeoZero said:

No,its just that you do not read or see the news regarding the game industry and their game companies as some people do daily.The limit of information is your minus on the subject. 

I'm familiar with the issue or i wouldn't have weighed in. I just don't agree with your narrative.

 

CDPR have a history of taking a bit of flack over their twitter feed, which a total of three people and a handful of games bloggers care about. In response they've made a tiny change to the character creator which has no game-play effects. That's the entirety of this non-story. Anita Sarkeesian tweeting something does not equal a conspiracy. And i still have no idea what you think third person cut-scenes inclusion or absence has to do with anything?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, eaterofspleens said:

True enough, although that cuts both ways.

Sorry,I have to agree with Kendo on this one,no one talked or mentioned about Twitter news.Just look at all the videos that people are posting for discussion about CDPR CP2077 marketing position in " general ".At least they can provide under the videos the links on the subject for researching if one's interested. 

Quote

i still have no idea what you think third person cut-scenes inclusion or absence has to do with anything?

That's the 2nd issue worldwide community not agreeing with CP2077 choice,as they false advertised at the beginning that 3P cut-scenes are the major role for creating your character and the existence of create a character system by logic, as the shooting mech is in 1P only. Otherwise it would be default male\female V facial look that is advertised till this day on any media. Which is totally fine if that would be a default choice of playing as male\female. 

Spoiler

 

?imw=637&imh=358&ima=fit&impolicy=Letter

480?cb=20190710015559

 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, RomeoZero said:

Sorry,I have to agree with Kendo on this one,no one talked or mentioned about Twitter news.Just look at all the videos that people are posting for discussion about CDPR CP2077 marketing position in " general ".At least they can provide under the videos the links on the subject for researching if one's interested.

I'd made no mention of twitter at that point. I don't actually use it. Cdprs marketing is pretty terrible that's true. And this is a massive overreaction to a silly marketing gimmick. It's possible for both parties to be in the wrong.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, RomeoZero said:

 

That's the 2nd issue worldwide community not agreeing with CP2077 choice,as they false advertised at the beginning that 3P cut-scenes are the major role for creating your character and the existence of create a character system by logic, as the shooting mech is in 1P only. Otherwise it would be default male\female V facial look that is advertised till this day on any media. Which is totally fine if that would be a default choice of playing as male\female. 

  Hide contents

 

?imw=637&imh=358&ima=fit&impolicy=Letter

480?cb=20190710015559

 

You still choose from those two body types, don't you, so if they had carried on with cutscenes, the only change would be which voice is coming out of your characters mouth. I honestly don't get what you mean here.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, eaterofspleens said:

You still choose from those two body types, don't you, so if they had carried on with cutscenes, the only change would be which voice is coming out of your characters mouth. I honestly don't get what you mean here.

 - " Rather than have a pre-defined character, similar to Geralt of Rivia from the Witcher franchise, CDPR elected to allow players to define their own character. Players will be able to play V with a customizable, genderless body type and can pick between a male or female sounding voice."

There is no information that you can play as default V, its shifted to create a cybersexual bodytype from 0 and choose a gender voice. Since there are already genderless voice AI assistants being created right now. No wonder,cause you know, hype ? makes ? so everyone is #trending.

That point of view is discussed above,that you are not understanding.Of course some conservative views takes that more personally.  

My (and not only mine) issue is only with 3P camera chopped from CP2077 game mechanics.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use