Sex in the front of the children?

[Nexussuckstwice]

7 hours ago, KoolHndLuke said:

I had a friend- my best friend at one time actually- that said he was exposed intentionally by his parents to...

 

 

 

 

 

[Tirloque]

41 minutes ago, Nexussuckstwice said:

Not true in religious families. Mormons for example would allow only certain sexual positions.

Anyone else is a sinner and goes to hell, apparently.

Can't imagine the books describing said legit positions. ^^

 

Yet it's irrelevant. The point is the laws of their state (let's say New York) allows them to choose not to do the positions they want, and other people to use said position at discretion. It's a private domain, you can do anything you want as long as you're not hurting someone else or someone else's freedom. And same goes for the freedom of worship by the way, in most truly democratic states.

[Nexussuckstwice]

Books do not prescribe to fuck choir boys as well.

 

10 minutes ago, Tirloque said:

Yet it's irrelevant. The point is the laws of their state (let's say New York) allows them to choose not to do

And their Church disapprove and they have to obey, because Jesus.

 

10 minutes ago, Tirloque said:

as long as you're not hurting someone else or someone else's freedom.

But they do?

Kids in religious families nothing but victims and adults are not free ether.

 

[Tirloque]

1 minute ago, Nexussuckstwice said:

Kids in religious families nothing but victims and adults are not free ether.

Possibly. But in the US they're free to choose to continue being religious or not when becoming adults.

1 minute ago, Nexussuckstwice said:

Books do not prescribe to fuck choir boys as well.

The one the judge has prescribes not to. With a years of imprisonment penalty up to two digits.

[ToJKa]

Just now, Tirloque said:

Possibly. But in the US they're free to choose to continue being religious or not when becoming adults.

And they for sure will, after being intdoctrinated for nearly two decades ?

[Nexussuckstwice]

1 minute ago, Tirloque said:

in the US they're free to choose to continue being religious or not when becoming adults. 

Awesome, and then you say parents can't fuck in front of the children, cause its bad for them.

Parents abusing and indoctrinating kids for years because Lord said so doesn't count.

 

(Hypocrisy is a sin!)

 

6 minutes ago, Tirloque said:

The one the judge has prescribes not to. With a years of imprisonment penalty up to two digits.

Then said judge send to prison 17 years old's cause exchanging their own photos is Evil.

[Jazzman]

31 minutes ago, Nexussuckstwice said:

Then said judge send to prison 17 years old's cause exchanging their own photos is Evil.

Depends on how many months you have left to figure it out before you reach legal adulthood and how dominated by religious dogmas the jurisdiction of the state you're living in is in fact. Seriously, a 17 years old selfist that might have received his draft card for this winter already is not exactly the child we are talking about...

[Nexussuckstwice]

14 minutes ago, Jazzman said:

Depends on how many months you have left to figure it out before you reach legal adulthood

Bless me father for i have sinned:

 

Twice:

 

[Di3sIrae]

Dear friends, that's funny how you can go off topic so easily.
And discussing about ageneralizations. Like "if a priest kills a man, then all priests are murderers". Easy there, do not judge a whole group as if everyone does the same.

 

All cases are unique cases. Like the main subject. A kid that sees his parents having sex can never live normally again for the rest of it's life. Another one may just go on and live like if it was nothing.

Also, the whole thing "because Lord said so" is what people that have a better unerstandment about Christianity gets mad with because of those that calls themselves Christians. People use a lot of excuses for what they want. If it is the DIvine Will, better, so no questions. Mos people still lives by the errors and mistakes that the church made years ago. Usually people use knowledge to bend others, and it will always be like this. People get it in their hands (even a good read on the Bible can show you how wrong some statements are), but they choose to only listen, and follow, and not think.

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge", isn't it?

Sorry, i went  astray too ?

[Tirloque]

57 minutes ago, ToJKa said:

And they for sure will, after being intdoctrinated for nearly two decades ?

Who cares ? The point is if they're unhappy with it, they can choose another path.

48 minutes ago, Nexussuckstwice said:

Awesome, and then you say parents can't fuck in front of the children, cause its bad for them.

Parents abusing and indoctrinating kids for years because Lord said so doesn't count.

 

(Hypocrisy is a sin!)

I wonder if misunderstanding is a sin as well ?

 

I don't see how it being ill-advised (but not forbidden) to copulated before one's children, in the privacy of your house, has anything to do with the freedom of choosing your religion. There is no link between being religious and sexual behaviors punished by US' laws. Apart from the fact you clearly hate said religion.

 

Now for facts :

• Have you read the book you're referring to ? The bible of those Christians you despise so much, where exactly does it mentions one should practice pedophilia ?
• Children abuse isn't specific to religious people. Very far from it. Only thing when it's a priest that commits such deed, you hear about it on the radio. While not hearing those hundreds of victims that get abused by their parents, their teachers or even their comrades, that professionals have to deal with every day. Does it not being linked to religion makes it any better for the abused child ? I don't think so.

 

TL;DR : your hatred for Christians has nothing to do with the reasons why it's ill advised to have sex in front of one's children. If you want to bash Christians, create a thread about it, at least you'll be on topic. ?

11 minutes ago, Di3sIrae said:

Dear friends, that's funny how you can go off topic so easily.
And discussing about generalizations. Like "if a priest kills a man, then all priests are murderers". Easy there, do not judge a whole group as if everyone does the same.

Indeed. For both points. The guy just seems so convinced that Christians have the monopoly of children abuse that he brought it on a topic about sexual education. ?

[winny257]

1 hour ago, Nexussuckstwice said:

 

But they do?

Kids in religious families nothing but victims and adults are not free ether.

 

Dog Shit, I grew up in a religious family, my parents did not force us (my siblings and I) to do anything.
One thing is for sure, I have in my 60 years of live never done anything bad. 

[DoctaSax]

Religion has nothing to do with the topic at hand, and bashing religions of any kind is against the rules. So let's just stop it right there.

[gucky4linux]

I have no idea how you think and if you even think, but for me, people kissing are the most normal thing in the world. Or are you religious (Catholic Church), then that's normal. Or are you one of the hypocritical Americans who call kisses evil, do WWW child pornography. Yes, I have to agree with you, but then your president has to do something about it.
Since the translation is done by the google translator errors can occur, so I add the source text.

gucky4linux

 

source:

 

Ich habe keine Ahnung wie du denkst und ob du überhaupt denkst, aber für mich sind menschen die sich küssen das normalste auf der welt. Oder bist du religiös (Katholische Kirche), dann ist DAS normal. Oder bist du einer der verlogenen US-Amerikaner die küssen als böse bezeichnen, und im WWW für Kinderpornografie werbung machen. Ja, da muß ich dir recht geben, dann muß  aber euer Präsident etwas dagegen unternehmen. 
Da die übersetzung vom google-translator durchgeführt wird können fehler vorkommen, daher füge ich den quelltext hinzu.

gucky4linux

 

I must add, the game has not been made for children. If an adult child lets Skyrim play, then he must be punished for it, not insult the other players

[winny257]

5 hours ago, gucky4linux said:

Ich habe keine Ahnung wie du denkst und ob du überhaupt denkst, aber für mich sind menschen die sich küssen das normalste auf der welt. Oder bist du religiös (Katholische Kirche), dann ist DAS normal. Oder bist du einer der verlogenen US-Amerikaner die küssen als böse bezeichnen, und im WWW für Kinderpornografie werbung machen. Ja, da muß ich dir recht geben, dann muß  aber euer Präsident etwas dagegen unternehmen. 
Da die übersetzung vom google-translator durchgeführt wird können fehler vorkommen, daher füge ich den quelltext hinzu.

gucky4linux

 

sorry in German

 

nein es geht um etwas völlig anderes, Eva, Ivy und Prince sind ein Dreier Paar (übrigens meine Freunde).
Sie wollen zusammen Kind(er) und jetzt zum Punkt (OP) anfrage * ist es ein problem wenn ihre Kind(er) beim Sex zuschaun*.

 

die meisten hier haben alles misverstanden und deshalb ist der Thread abgedriftet.

[V The Heretic]

You know, this is an interesting topic. Sex in front of the kids? Right or wrong? Hm.

Well, in American society, unsure if it was stated, however, your children can possibly be taken away and/or you could be deemed a "sex offender" in extreme cases. (Yep, seen it happen before.) While I could not careless if someone has sex in front of their children, it's based upon your own morals on whether you should do it or not. Weigh the pro's and con's on the situation at hand. Yes, they are teaching sexual education at an earlier age because media is subjecting younger and younger children to sexual situations that they do not understand. Which in turn leads to higher rate of underage sex. (Prove me wrong.) Is sex natural? Yes. Let's go about this differently.

Having sex in front of your children will have many positive and negative effects. While, everyone will always focus on the negative effects of it, such has children becoming desensitized to this, will act upon their own accord and etc. Where the problem lies, is not the sex, but the parenting behind it. Some children predisposed to sex will wait until they have an significant other to have sex, while others will do it well underage. It goes for the same for sheltered children where the parents do everything in their power to avoid their children from ever seeing it in the first place. Honestly, I do not think there is truly a statistic that leans to one side or the other. The only thing that is for certain, is the argument of morals.

To be quite honest, if you want to do it, do it. However, education and guidance in the fundamental factors that will setup a better foundation in the process. No, sexual education does not teach the other aspects such as love because it's there to teach about the body and the process of sexual intercourse. Honestly, the job of teaching love should come from the parents. Being interactive with your child in this aspect, (No, I do not mean sex with them, but the educational purpose) will set them up for a better life. Also, the whole thing, if a child is subjected to sex at a younger age, less likely to question their sexuality. I want to be fairly certain that a person that chooses to explore their sexuality is deemed upon the choices they make and what makes them happy. Letting them find out their choices is the way to go. One could argue in the case of that statement, that a heterosexual family could be subjecting their child to only the "heterosexual agenda" and gay couples subjecting the child to only the "gay agenda". (Yes, a joke. Don't take it too hard. XD) No matter what way you spin it, the choice is yours. How you go about the sexual process, what you educate your child on and etc, is all up to you. This is not pedophilia by any stretch of the imagination, but more so normality. However, it could teach your child that it is normal to have sex in front of others and then you will end up having to get them released from prison due to them having public sex. (LMAO) However, with proper reinforcement and education, that won't happen. I shall leave it up to you to make that choice. :3

[Evaloves4]

5 hours ago, Zombified said:

You know, this is an interesting topic. Sex in front of the kids? Right or wrong? Hm.

...

Thanks for your comment. I agree with you and I explained in one of my later post in this thread that sexual education is very important and that in our schools it is mandatory subject. We, as future parents will also educate our children the best we know and certainly won't have a a sex in front of them if they are disturb with it.

[Halstrom]

On the positive side, sex in front of the kids might be incentive for a 35yo kid to move out of home

[Evaloves4]

1 minute ago, Halstrom said:

On the positive side, sex in front of the kids might be incentive for a 35yo kid to move out of home

LOL. True.

[Evaloves4]

7 hours ago, winny257 said:

sorry in German

 

nein es geht um etwas völlig anderes, Eva, Ivy und Prince sind ein Dreier Paar (übrigens meine Freunde).
Sie wollen zusammen Kind(er) und jetzt zum Punkt (OP) anfrage * ist es ein problem wenn ihre Kind(er) beim Sex zuschaun*.

 

die meisten hier haben alles misverstanden und deshalb ist der Thread abgedriftet.

Danke winny. Hugs.

[winny257]

10 hours ago, EvalovesEP said:

Thanks for your comment. I agree with you and I explained in one of my later post in this thread that sexual education is very important and that in our schools it is mandatory subject. We, as future parents will also educate our children the best we know and certainly won't have a a sex in front of them if they are disturb with it.

Sex education at schools, delicate subject and not only in Germany!
I would explode if my children had told me, that her teacher oral or vaginal intercourse, in all details would have represented.

[Evaloves4]

3 hours ago, winny257 said:

Sex education at schools, delicate subject and not only in Germany!
I would explode if my children had told me, that her teacher oral or vaginal intercourse, in all details would have represented.

Winny, that's not "that" type of education.  The teachers do not recommend sex especially with multiple partners, but if teens decide it to have it, they teach them how to have safe sex. They do not teach them what poses to take and how to practice oral sex.

[winny257]

1 hour ago, EvalovesEP said:

Winny, that's not "that" type of education.  The teachers do not recommend sex especially with multiple partners, but if teens decide it to have it, they teach them how to have safe sex. They do not teach them what poses to take and how to practice oral sex. 

Oh, here in germany other things have already happened.
some teachers have been dismissed from the school service, because they forced underage students with a dildo to perform the oral sex.
if someone enlightens my children (sexuality), then I was that and nobody else!

 

I am a peace-loving person, but in this point I'm become *Fuchsteufelswild* Fox Devil Angry.

[Resdayn]

1 hour ago, winny257 said:

Oh, here in germany other things have already happened.
some teachers have been dismissed from the school service, because they forced underage students with a dildo to perform the oral sex.

What the heck ?

[ToJKa]

The machine translator must have messed something up with that sentence.

 

If not, see my avatar ?

[winny257]

1 hour ago, ToJKa said:

The machine translator must have messed something up with that sentence.

 

If not, see my avatar ?

nothing screwed up, I even go one step further!
it even happened several times, that teachers to the sexual contact, came with her students, 14 - 16 years old!
the internet is full of such offenses!

 

https://www.focus.de/panorama/welt/39-jaehrige-festgenommen-us-lehrerin-hat-verhaeltnis-mit-schueler-es-ist-der-freund-ihrer-eigenen-tochter_id_9315911.html

 

Spoiler

https://www.google.de/search?q=lehrer+sexueller+konfakt+zu+ihren+schülern&oq=lehrer+sexueller+konfakt+zu+ihren+schülern&aqs=chrome..69i57.37615j1j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

 

There were two things I have the school prohibited!
1. Sexual education
2. religious education

 

edit: wenn du willst, dann schreibe ich Dir das nächste mal auf deutsch.
mal sehen wer dann dumm aus der Wäsche schaut. ?