Jump to content

Gothfather

Members
  • Content Count

    181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Gothfather

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 01/01/1970

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Could we get a standard for people posting DNA with pics please? If you use mods that change appearance can you please put the name of the mods please. mods that affect appearance WILL change how the game reads DNA. Which will change appearance. Hair mods, texture mods can all either subtly change how the game reads DNA or drastically change DNA so the game wont read it anymore. Also are you using a beauty trait? So when you post a pic and DNA add MODS: none [obviously if you are not using mods] or MODS: [Insert name of mods; location you got them from] Trait: none, pretty, comely or beautiful It doesn't do the community any good if they can't use your DNA because you didn't disclose what mods you are using.
  2. So I guess this is dead after 2 years and no progress?
  3. lol I remember when Skyrim was released and people called it shit because it didn't compare with a fully modded oblivion and people made long list as to why skyrim would never be superior to Oblivion and so on. Here we are seeing the exact same attitude and toxic childish behavior. We all know what happen in the end don't we? Eventually oblivion as good as it was, was surpassed and it took a while. It was over two years before a comparable sex mod was released for skyrim at at first blush it was significantly inferior to what oblivion had. Well that change didn't it? As i recall there was belief that we could never get an oblivion style sex mod in skyrim because people couldn't import animations to skyrim, in the beginning, but that was solved. Each game has its own unique challenges for modders and there is ZERO reason to think that the challenges of Newrim make it insurmountable to oldrim. 12 months after skyrim was released it was still "inferior" to a fully modded oblivion and the anti-skyrim fanatics where still decrying skyrim, yet almost by magic it slowly made improvements that eventually surpassed oblivion. You'd think that given the improvements we have seen in SSE people would stop with the anti-newrim rhetoric but no some people never learn from history. 1st on this very threat we got a claim of without a slew of tools newrim was dead in the water for modding and within a month of that post most of the tools were created for newrim. yet that still didn't make them think twice about this idea the newrim will forever be inferior to oldrim. 2nd we got the community of SSE modders is too small and it will never have the mod depth of Skyrim well after one year we see there are over 9.3k mods for newrim which is roughly 1/6th as many as oldrim. How old is oldrim? 6 years. Well what do you know seems that there is about a equal number of mods per year for oldrim and newrim. Showing that there is enough interest in newrim to create a viable community. Hell the once lauded nothing will surpass it oblivion has only 3 times the number of mods as newrim and its been around for a decade longer than newrim. So I'd say newrim is doing just fine in mod support. (using nexus numbers for comparisons) 3rd its without skse64 you can't have mod customization. How soon people forget we have had mod customization using books and the like for a decade. People simply used the older inferior method until skse64 comes out. oh wait its in released alpha testing now, almost as if by magic all the limitations of newrim are being solved. how is this possible? 4th Newrim isn't more stable that's a myth newrim just doesn't have all the badly made plugins causing crashes and so on. Or they act like because it isn't 100% stable that stability isn't really a strong point in newrim's favor, so they must point out every little issue with newrim's stability as though the two games are close on this issue. Yet the complaints about newrim crashes are significantly less than oldrim. how could this be? Must be magic again. Well at least most of the nay sayers have admitted that yes Newrim is more than just a little more stable it is significantly more stable than oldrim with all the tweaks and tricks to bypass the 32 bit limitations. Now they just down play how important stability is and make it sound like gamers really don't care about stability. lol 5th now it is Newrim uses preset shaders so it can never look as good as oldrim. Really? Really? You think this is an insurmountable problem? You don't think that people will come up with solutions in the next 5 years? 6th I am sure people will cling to yet a new reason why oldrim is superior once the current set of challenges are solved. I still, every once in a while hear someone claim modded oblivion is a better experience than modded oldrim but who takes them seriously now? They sit in their own corner of the web ranting against skyrim making their mods for oblivion and the rest of us look at them with pity as their own narrow mindedness has robbed them of experiencing great moments in gaming. But by all means tell the world how terrible newrim is i'm sure history wont repeat itself, it never does, right? And to be clear as i just know people can't look past their ideological beliefs (and will read this as me claiming something i never said nor implied), modded oldrim is better than modded newrim, but the gap has closed significantly in the last year. Give it 2 more years and i am sure you will see that gap close even more. I'd say in two years (roughly) from now newrim will be on par with oldrim, not exact but close enough. Maybe it will happen sooner maybe it will take longer but the gap is closing. You just have to look at sse modding in 2016 to 2017 to see just how far sse has come.
  4. ah crap lol I came back a year later hoping this mod had migrated to Special edition but it still is in the works. Silvist finish it on your own time, looking forward to seeing it updated and making it part of my build.
  5. Err did you read the last post by the mod author? It was just two post above your own, talk about LAZY.
  6. achievable, you can get better visuals than that there are countless enb's for original skyrim on internet but make sure PC you will be building is strong enb's require high end PC's. Yeah I've got a couple of guys at work that are heavy into PC gaming but they're not really modders, so they're recommending the high end graphics cards but don't seem that bothered about CPU or RAM. What would be the priority to achieve this? Or is it a combination of all 3? CPU and GPU. skyrim is very CPU intensive it requires decent quad core or better CPU to run smoothly. thats for vanilla game add mods on top specially some heavy weight mods like enb then you really need strong CPU and GPU. get a decent i5 or better from intel and a amd/nvidia GPU of your choice depending on what resolution you want to play to match the CPU, you don't want to see CPU bottlenecking your high end GPU, it will be a money waste then. This. The above said you don't need to go crazy on the CPU either. A sold i5 with 4 cores and 4 threads like a i5-6600k is all you need for gaming. You are better off getting an i5-6600k than say an i7-6700k if you take the money you saved on getting the i5 and spend that on getting a better graphics card, for a "gaming" machine.
  7. much of this agree with and it is almost a month old post so baring this in mind I think you are right the immediate benefits of Newrim are for consoles and mores so for Xbone then PS4. However I think the future benefits will favour PC users more. There in just shy of a month we have seen a lot on this list added to Newrim FNIS, XPMSE, tesv edit we are seeing animations added hair packs, eye packs, eyebrow packs we already have a newrim version of the unofficial patch. BringtheNoice also listed a whole slew of tools that are now working for SSE. We a missing SKSE and other tools and mods but what I think this shows is that the modding community is well healthy for Newrim. It hasn't yet been a month and we already have most of the tools needed. I might also add that many mod authors have gone to the pre MCM days and are using spells and books to give players configurable mods. This said you are still correct, oldrim + mods will give a getting experience than newrim in all ways but one, newrim is more stable it is less prone to crashes. This is the reason I feel newrim will give pc gamers better long term benefits, building a modded game on a 64 bit foundation eliminates a whole slew of tweaks, fixes and workarounds that were required to make 32bit oldrim stable. Right now oldrim hasn't been surpassed and it may never be but we are seeing consistent updates about SK64 and vital modes like XPMSE and FNIS mods are in game already. I am willing to bet that rewrim will surpass oldrim in the future lets ee how things are in nov 2017. We should remember that it took a while for oldrim to get really great. The nice thing about newrim is it appears to have invigorated a lot of mod authors again. in less than a month the nexus has over 3100 mods for newrim that is a great start. At this rate in less than a year Newrim will have over half as many mods as 5 year old Oldrim based on their current rate of growth for both games.
  8. Who said anything about not voicing opinions? If you wanna say that something I say is wrong, then by all means correct me, I just don't like insults. Also, why are you screaming all that at ME? I agree with a lot of what you said, and I got sse for free. I'm not complaining because I didn't get it for free, I was complaining because I think beth's motives are bad. I would be willing to pay for sse, but I don't like the intent behind some of their actions and policies. You might say who cares about their intentions if I'm getting a free game, but that is the problem. If all we stand for is the end goal/product, then things will go down hill. I don't care about me getting a free game, I care about beth getting comfortable doing shady/suspect things. I repeat, even if their future games are sub-par, above all I just don't want them to become like ea. You haven't proven their intentions at all your own points contradict your theroy of their intentions. Which again you ignore why do I insult you because you ignore the concept that mutual benifit doesn't negate benifits, Win-Win doesn't mean, win minus win, it means both parties win, this has been academically proven to be the best sort of business transaction that can be made, where both the company and the consumer win. Yet you make is appear like it is nefarious if both parties gain something from a transaction. You and everyone else on this thread refuse to address this point so yes I think that is idiotic and stupid and I think you should call people on such things. Hell we just learned some of the idiots here are attacking the quality of newrim without actually playing the game at all. Sooo you tell me how is making evaluations on newrim without actually playing it not idiotic? how are people doing this not stupid and not idiots? Hell at least I can praise oldrim where it out shines newrim because well I've played both so I can make an honest assessment of both games merits and flaws compared to each other. When someone does something stupid and idiotic and calling them on it an insult or just stating fact? I would suggest that when you have facts that people are being stupid calling them stupid isn't insulting it is accurately describing them.
  9. Proving my point that you are full of sh!t. So you haven't even played the game don't know if you even own it so how the f@ck can you evaluate it and criticise it if you aren't even knowledgeable enough to know if you have the game? "This games sucks! I haven't played it I complained that it wasn't actually free but I may actually own it but I am not sure because to me making judgements on games without playing then and not knowing the facts and doing research show how in tune I am with the gaming industry! If you like the game or claim it is free and think Bethesda can choose how they give away their products free because no gamers has a divine right to get anything for free, you are just a fanboi. You and Bethesda deserve each other!" [stomps feat] LMOA I said from the beginning that facts didn't mean a thing to you lot and here you are proving my point. I have zero respect for you. You haven't played the game complained about the policy of the games free state but don't even know if you own it or not? I love to know how you can make an informed evaluation on the merits of newrim when you haven't played it. Sure I could see you say based on what I have seen I wont buy it without playing it but you have QQ on specifics you can't even evaluate for yourself as true or false because you don't know anything about the game. "get out of this thread! It is a place for mindless rants and not a place for anyone to actually bring facts and thought into the discussion" my response? People need to know just how crap your opinion is because it isn't based on any experience or gained knowledge from use it is just some QQing gamer having a mindless childish rant. And there needs to be a contrary voice to stupidity. And yes it is stupid to evaluate a game either its flaws or merits is you have NEVER played the game at all.
  10. Some possible ideas male vampire lord. http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/24342/? http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/66130/? http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/10864/? http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/65146/? This might seem out of place but the following picture shows armour I could see Harkon wearing. IMO. http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/14194/? These are five armours I found that might work. These armours at least look like someone of note uses them and not a bandit or peasant. I don't recommend a helm/hood for any of them but it is up to you. Male armour is a lot harder to find anything that 'pops.' But hopefully this helps you find something viable. I can't do anything meaningful to help so this is the best I can do . I really like the idea of bringing this to SSE as right now I did a random start for SSE using alternative starts and started of as a Vampire so figured I'd do Dawnguard as soon as Vampire mods get ported and there have been a surprising number of them starting to appear for SSE like underworld vampire eyes and so on. Yours will be like the crown jewel. Being able to fly as a VL would be perfect.
  11. lol yeah i always though the vampire lord assets should have been used for vampire minions that were lesser vampires that came about from the result of a "failed" gifting of the vampire lord blood. Instead of dying that Harkon says is common to those whom he gifts the blood to you become this mutant freak. But I guess they used gargoyles as the lesser servants for VLs. i'll see what I can find now that I have an idea what you are looking for, regal is a good description for your vision. Helps narrow down what armours to show you.
  12. I just don't beleive you. I don't beleive an adult would act as you. Maybe i lack the imagination to beleive an adult could act like a such a childish as$hole as yourself but i honestly beleive you are a child. The fact that you have spent so much time trying to 'prove' you are an adult strikes me as what a child would do. i don't imagine an adult would care to spend the time trying to convince a stranger they are an adult. Maybe i am wrong but I just don't beleive you are 20+ let alone 59 years old. I really don't like personal insults. Focusing on someone else's age so much seems to me to be just as childish. I agree with some of what you said, but part of the reason we would all prefer that most people left is because everyone on the pro sse side of the discussion seems to just wanna keep throwing insults. Why can't we all just have a civilized discussion? I think this might be a result of the language barrier, but winny would prefer, that the game be split up and that she be given what she already has. I think she has all except hf, so she would like to have sse base game, and sse db and dg. There is as far as I know no reason to defend beth's choice to make the entire game into 1 package. They could have just as easily sold the base game for for like 40 and the 2 dlc for 7.50 each and hearthfire for 5. As far as I know, there is also no functional reason to keeping them all together. I'm pretty sure you can remove all the dlc and play just the base game if you wanted to. So winny would like it if they gave here the base game and 2 dlc but not hf for free, because she hates hf anyways and would likely remove from her game if she ever switched to sse. Again, giving out the base game for free even, would have been beneficial to them, as there are a lot of modders who don't own all dlc, and don't want to fork over 60 just so they can port their mods, they are more than happy sticking with oldrim. Giving them just the base game, and maybe expecting them to buy the dlc, would have been a compromise, and one beth would have gotten a lot out of, as there would be more people to create and port mods for sse/console. It is a fact that the reason they gave out the game hoping the modding community to would be willing to port mods for console. If they gave out just the base game for people who don't own dlcs, there would have been even more people willing to port stuff. middlefinger, that video is hilarious. And NOTHING you say negates the good already done by Bethesda giving the game to only people who owned ALL of skyrim. You first imply that the only reason to give the game free to PC users was to get mods but that can be logically proven false with one piece of evidence being your own bloody example. If they gave the base game of SSE free to everyone they would have more mods. They didn't, that alone proves that getting mods to console being the only motivation is false. AND it STILL doesn't nullify the benefits for consumers. Again and you people STILL refuse to acknowledge and repeatedly sidestep is the mutual benefits do not cancel out a benefit. Mutual benefit is the BEST form of business transaction. Maybe in the idiot gamers world it isn't where wankers think only If I get a benefit does it count but that is simply bs. Bethesda getting a benefit and players getting a benefit doesn't negate the benefit to Bethesda nor does it negate the benefit to gamers. Another point ignored is that if ONLY getting mods ported for console was their agenda they would not have offered the game free to all PC users. They had a know quantity of modders on steam workshop and Bethesda net for fallout 4. They knew who were the modders and because you link your Bethesda net to their steam they could have sent every mod author a free copy and charge the rest of use full price, they could have offered free copies to Nexus mod authors as well but that would have taken a bit more logistic but very doable. Why didn't they? If this was only a profit motive driven gesture why not limit the free copies to mod authors? They didn't and the proves that while they did want modders to make mods for console that wasn't their sole motivation. They give PC users a solid that recognition whiney little b!tches keep asking for and instead of saying thank you, you QQ because you had to own all the DLCs which were on sale for more than 1/2 price off twice on steam and at least once on humble bundle that I saw and I wasn't even looking between the time of announcement and release. For Christ sake they Oldrim was on sale ALL f@cking week before it's release. The release of SSE was profit motivated, true, all products a company makes are that isn't a bad thing. only idiot gamrs cage company making money are wrong or evil or somehow sullies the game. Only morons think that way and children. The actions Bethesda took with their PC audience with regards to SSE were not profit driven. Now you can argue that because PC sales were the smallest chunk and the least likely to buy SSE their gesture didn't cost them much. And I would agree but that still doesn't negate that it did cost them potential profit and they didn't have to do it at all. So doing so was still a generous thing to do for PC users. we still benefited by the act. AND any PC user who didn't either was oblivious to the situation which isn't Bethesda's fault or the made the CHOICE NOT to benefit from the free offer. As soon as you choose NOT to benefit from the free offer that choice is on you and not Bethesda. You act like the revelation that Bethesda had something to gain from giving the game free is like magical faery dust that magics away the benefit that players got a free IMPROVED game. The made this offer available to ALL players. It was announced MONTHS in advance what was required for a free version and they OFFERED the requirements on more than one occasion on sale. Of all the f@cking BS things Bethesda has done as a company you idiots are attacking them for doing a good thing. Yes idiots. I know you'll wah wah wah about name calling but NONE of you will address the principle that mutual benefit is a good thing not a bad thing and doesn't negate another persons' benefit. As along as you spin that narrative you are idiots. The term Win-Win exists for a reason. But in your narrow gamer perspective you can't win unless other lose. It is why you have shaped things in the manner you have, Bethesda got a benefit ergo they suck and the benefit to pc players is null and void. Console gamers got the most benefit ergo Bethesda hates PC player even though we had the opportunity to get the game free. So long as your side ignore FACTS and spin falsehoods like people saying you couldn't get the DLCs after they announced SSE an obvious bs lie. Or make out like giving the game free had no benefit to PC gamers I will call you on it and I wont spare your feelings because morons deserved to be called out on their BS. You'll notice that I am only responding to a specific type of posts on here. Ones that spew BS. Someone says they don't like it I leave it alone because there is no right or wrong with things that are subjective. It is only the BS falsehoods that get my response. Someone recently said they found the game free tried it found it more stable but couldn't get the game to look how they had it with oldrim went back and accepted the instability that came with it. No unreasonable BS in that post. Just a perfectly acceptable response to a subjective topic. Didn't try to lie or spin things, Just basically said not my cup of tea.
  13. These games cost me at that time (NEW) respectively 49, 95 German marks. I call Bullsh!t. What adult b!tches and complains about older products going on sale and people buying them on sale? Seriously what adult looks with hatred on a company for selling older merchandise on sale? Children resent others for getting things cheaper than themselves, adults know this is how things work and learn to take advantage of this for themselves. I really don't believe you were born when Arena or Daggerfall were first released because you'd have to be well over 22 years old to have bought arena yourself which is 22 year old so say 15 year old to have bought the game and that is generous that YOU bought it at 15. Which would make you 37 at a minimum. Seriously what 37+ year old thinks it is grounds for justification to hate a company for having sales? What 37+ year old thinks opting out of an option means anyone that opts in to an option is ruining their experience? That is like saying "I prefer coke and every Pepsi drinker is ruining my coke." You act like a child because I highly suspect you are a child ergo there is no way to bought a 22 year old game new for full price. I bought Daggerfall on August 31, 1996! I bought my first computer in 1982 One of my first RPGs * Lands of Lore: The Throne of Chaos * 1993. I just don't beleive you. I don't beleive an adult would act as you. Maybe i lack the imagination to beleive an adult could act like a such a childish as$hole as yourself but i honestly beleive you are a child. The fact that you have spent so much time trying to 'prove' you are an adult strikes me as what a child would do. i don't imagine an adult would care to spend the time trying to convince a stranger they are an adult. Maybe i am wrong but I just don't beleive you are 20+ let alone 59 years old.
  14. That's the whole gist of it. But Bethesda isn't thinking about modders who don't give a shit about Hearthfires, which was a point I made across a while back. Since this is a whole PR Marketing attempt to lure modders into porting their work not only to SSE but to console, like they did with beta testers, which was pretty fucked up if you know the story behind that, they could have thought about those who mod the game and don't have all DLCs and just give them what they already own in order to increase the possibilities for more mods on SSE and even on console since that is what's important out of Bethesda and SSE. SSE is like USLEEP, if you don't own all the DLCs, you are out of luck. What is your point? You have the OPTION to opt in or opt out. How is this a bad thing for Bethesda or gamers in general? This entire thread is more of a circle jerk of people trying to convince themselves that their CHOICE to not get SSE either for free or pay for it is the right one and the Bethesda are as$holes for even giving us three options on SSE. As I have pointed out mutual benefit doesn't negate benefits. Just because Bethesda benefits from giving SSE free to people doesn't negate that getting SSE is a benefit. WTF is wrong with people? You can't gain a benefit unless it only benefits you and you alone? What in inherently WRONG with giving you these three choices actually 4 choices 1) Getting SSE for free if you met the EASY to obtain requirements 2) Allowing people to opt out of SSE 3) Allowing people to buy SSE if they decide they want it 4) Allowing people to buy oldrim instead (Oldrim is still available as are all the DLCs) Nothing about those choices is exclusionary or bad business practises or inherently anti-consumer of all the things Bethesda does that is anticonsumer these choices are inherently pro-consumer because they give YOU the choices and you are never frozen out of playing either SSE, oldrim or both. You are still able to play them all with full functionality. What blows my mind is that you made a conscious choice not to opt in and resent Bethesda for making that choice. How are they to blame? Well they didn't offer the SSE without benefits to themselves. SO? How does that negate or nullify the benefit to the consumer? A question you lot REFUSE to acknowledge or answer, I suspect because doing so forces you to acknowledge you have no foundation for you QQing. Wah wah wah Bethesda didn't treat some modders well in the beta. So? What is your point? That doesn't magically made SSE crap or magically nullify the benefits of SSE nor does that negate the benefit to gamers for getting it Free. I also think this is real tinfoil hat BS as well. If the only reason to give SSE free was to get console mods they could have contacted every creator of a mod on Bethesda.net for fallout 4 and the nexus and said if you own oldrim plus the DLCs then we will send you free copy of sse. But they didn't they gave the SSE free offer for EVERY PC user. And they did this at the announcement of the game's release. So lets not warp history to fit your tinfoil hat theories. AND to be clear YES giving SSE benefited Bethesda by getting modders to mod the game on console but again how does that nullify the benefit of getting the game free for all PC users who OWN the content? If you choose not to buy all the content stop whining that not all mods work. What you are blaming Bethesda for USLEEP now because modders choose to make their mod only available to people who own all the DLCs? Those evil modders please or is that evil Bethesda you sold a game of the year edition? You are not even making sense. Yes if you make the CHOICE to opt out you don't get the advantages but you CHOSE to opt out so stop the being a child and crying over your adult decisions.
  15. These games cost me at that time (NEW) respectively 49, 95 German marks. I call Bullsh!t. What adult b!tches and complains about older products going on sale and people buying them on sale? Seriously what adult looks with hatred on a company for selling older merchandise on sale? Children resent others for getting things cheaper than themselves, adults know this is how things work and learn to take advantage of this for themselves. I really don't believe you were born when Arena or Daggerfall were first released because you'd have to be well over 22 years old to have bought arena yourself which is 22 year old so say 15 year old to have bought the game and that is generous that YOU bought it at 15. Which would make you 37 at a minimum. Seriously what 37+ year old thinks it is grounds for justification to hate a company for having sales? What 37+ year old thinks opting out of an option means anyone that opts in to an option is ruining their experience? That is like saying "I prefer coke and every Pepsi drinker is ruining my coke." You act like a child because I highly suspect you are a child ergo there is no way to bought a 22 year old game new for full price.
×
×
  • Create New...