Porn actresses are whores. No normal man wants to marry a whore. She belongs to the streets.

Porn actors are male whores unworthy to be married. They belong to the streets to be fucked by street dogs and thugs.

Some may not have a problem, but I would not want this, and would not marry a porn actor.

9 minutes ago, LadySmoks said:

Some may not have a problem...

 > That's me. I don't care about person's past. Fuck past. The presence and future is important. There re many reason why someone shouldn't marry someone. I surely wouldn't marry midget, fat and old, but somebody else would. There are things i the life one can and should change, but if certain group of people label you for the rest of your life, even after positive change, than fuck it. I do not even want to meet them.

I am not religious but I like what Jesus said to pharisees and to the woman caught in idolatry.

The 'news' industry was using clickbait before computers existed.  The original looks like a perfect example.

Porn co-stars can be seen as simply exes who have more respect for each other, on more levels.

Imagine if our promiscuous years had been filmed. Imagine if X's total of one night stands had to be added to Y's toal of one night stands and if the sum was arbitrarily deemed too high by a conformist blob their love, relationship or future was doomed. He's a dope and anybody who'd remark to her/their faces about it not only lays bare their predilections but their ill-manners. She'll find someone better.

Its better to know these things before a relationship gets serious, that way the blow softens over time or ends the relationship before either side gets truly hurt. You can't really blame either side for this, the guy is just too vanilla and the girl has a history.

Frankly, if this is enough to shake his commitment now, I feel it could have gone a little better if he had time to think it over. tis unfortunate.

Imagine her disappointment too if, as could well be the case, she's aesthetically out of his league but loved him for his character. Only to find that his character not only included a lack of acceptance but culminated in it.

> To those like the one's I deleted for misbehaving: REEEEEAAADDDDDD CAREFULY BEFORE REPLYING

Quote from OP:

> The article says that she told him about her past and that she broke up with that before they started dating.

On 12/24/2021 at 6:01 PM, qalavix said:

The 'news' industry was using clickbait before computers existed.  The original looks like a perfect example.

Original news site:

Google translation:

> @Pamatronic - fuck off from my threads, posts and blogs. Normal person would accept nice asking but since you aren't this is the only language you understand! If you keep harassing me I promise you a war, stupid fuck!

On 12/15/2021 at 2:43 PM, Evaloves4 said:

The presence and future is important.

+1

It irritates me how he could dump his girl friend.

Most likely, he was very happy with her in bed. And most likely he would have happily wanked to her movies if he wouldn't know her in person.

I suggest she should be happy to be rid of him.

Well, i would be positively surprised.

I mean you would have someone very experienced. What is not to like. Unless of course, you were very religious perhaps.

Btw. isn't that every men's dream? A pro in bed. I would not mind. But of course men see it differently. They want nuns as partners but sluts in bed. Preferably submissive.
Strange world. (some are not as open as they think)

6 hours ago, Evaloves4 said:

> @Pamatronic - fuck off from my threads, posts and blogs. Normal person would accept nice asking but since you aren't this is the only language you understand! If you keep harassing me I promise you a war, stupid fuck!

You won't go to war alone!

You and I may disagree on a topic, but respect and civility will always be!!!

4 hours ago, wutpickel said:

Well, i would be positively surprised.

I mean you would have someone very experienced. What is not to like. Unless of course, you were very religious perhaps.

Btw. isn't that every men's dream? A pro in bed. I would not mind. But of course men see it differently. They want nuns as partners but sluts in bed. Preferably submissive.
Strange world. (some are not as open as they think)

For me, and this is where @Evaloves4 and I can disagree and remain friends, as it is the public nature of a porn actor or actress career. I am a very private person... perhaps more so because of the nature of my husband's long past military. He is VERY much against public photos, as trolls will use anything to create problems, both socially and money.

Also, I personally much prefer that my husband's sex life, whether before me, or now, not be part of someone's video collection.

As said before, this is simply my way... really nothing to do with my religious beliefs, otherwise my son may have been a virgin birth! ?

And... I was not struck down before clicking "submit comment"!

It could have been that he was upset she didn't tell him earlier (giving the most generous view of the story), though likely, he has several biases and preconceptions of what a pornstar is.  

While I would have some worry about skill in bed (if she has been with professionals, how does an amateur with average size equipment compete?), if she was totally into me, then rock on.     However, if she were sleeping around without giving me a chance to have a say in it (You know if I have a chance to say "you are leaving to go fuck @Evaloves4?  Ok  well can I watch? No?  Ok then take pictures and have fun, dear") , then it becomes an issue of trust.    

The past is what makes us what we are, so our past is important in that aspect.   

@steelpanther24 I get that.

Though some are swingers by nature. Depends i have to guess.
But as a general rule. If you do not know what job your special one has, why would you commit in the first place. Dum dum.

This seems like one of these headlines from the national inquire or publications like it.

Compete? How could i? But i willing to learn.

Actually, the generalized term 'porn star' doesn't say anything about her except her willingness to have sex in front of a camera and have it published.  

I seem to recall reading something on, uh... a Seattle-based website dealing with sex topics, like Dan Savage and others; and someone saying that the difference between 'porn sex' and 'sex with a romantic partner' was quite a lot, and the porn sex was far more like a job.

Reading a bit about how filming porn actually works, it may be that having sex for ten minutes is twice or three times as long as the average 'scene', because of video editing.  Figure that every time the camera angle 'changes', all the actors took a break, went to the bathroom, refreshed makeup, and who knows what else before they got back into position and restarted.

Non-porn sex may not be as acrobatic (and muscle-straining), and maybe she just doesn't want to go to all the effort, costuming, makeup, hair... maybe she'd just like a twosome on a Saturday morning, without having to spend two hours or more in prep, plus a recent enema.

She might not want semen in her eyes; I've heard it stings.

Why I said it was clickbait - without watching (non-porn) video+audio of the two of them for WEEKS - or knowing them personally - we don't know what was going on in the relationship.  At all. Maybe her porn past bothered him, maybe he feels inadequate compared to her imagined past... or maybe she wanted more than he felt like giving, or wanted him to start exercising and stop drinking and playing video games so much... or maybe she knows what she wants in bed, and he got tired of being told how to do things - as if he knows what makes her motor go by telepathy or something? I always preferred being told what I could do better... or maybe she dumped him, and this is his revenge... or maybe HE has a paraphilia that SHE couldn't handle or didn't want to deal with, and she dumped him and this is his revenge... or maybe neither of them actually exist.  But hey, it got your - and our - attention with that headline, didn't it?  Whereas if the headline had been "GUY BREAKS UP WITH GIRLFRIEND" we'd all say "Who cares?  So what?".

4 hours ago, LadySmoks said:

Also, I personally much prefer that my husband's sex life, whether before me, or now, not be part of someone's video collection.

Oh, okay, sorry; I'll get right on that... *begins deleting hundreds of gigabytes of video files*  Say, does this mean I should take out the cameras too?

? Do I even need to say this was entirely lies told for humorous purposes?