> One among many things that thrilled me about my Prince when we started dating was what he told me when I wanted to tell him about my past for I didn't want to hide anything from him and that he wouldn't be surprised, better, shocked when he finds out about me. He said: "Princess, I do not care what you did before we met, unless you want to tell me to lighten your soul. But, as for me, I love you as you are and your past is completely irrelevant to me." And he mean it. As we advanced in our relationship he learned and faced with many ugly things from my past, but he handled all unpleasantness extremely well showing me that he truly loves me.

> On the other hand there are men and women who must know and insist on knowing their partner's past. Some of them accept all ugliness from the past, but some of them can't. It was to much to bare and they broke up. Were they truly in love or not is not up to me to judge but I don't see what the fuck someone's (bad) past has to do with presence especially if person changed. Who cares how many guys (and girls) I fucked or how many girls my husband fucked before we met! Whatever happened in the past, should stay in the past. Well, someone might say: "I want to know if my partner is ex convict, or molester, bank robber and similar." So, what if they were, but aren't anymore?! Again, if your partner does not live his/her past in presence, who cares?! What matters is: