Man Pussy for RaceMenu

[SylvianAddress]

 

That said, it would be nice if someone makes an actual vagina for SOS/SAM, as while this trick works it leaves quite a lot to be desired.

 

 

Yeah, I've been hoping for that kind of mod myself.

[wardrake]

nice someone finally made this. I don't use Sam, could you make this for Sos. If you need help b3lisario who is working on Sos could help in making it work.

[Niobia]

For everyone confused about "T-Boys" scientific studies show that only gay men (and some bi men) are into them when it comes to porn (the key word is PORN). This video explains why straight men love futanari porn and not gay men. While gay men love men-with-vaginas-porn and not straight men.

 

Women aren't as visual as men and have much more complicated sexualities than men so to speak. So research on these things for women is much hard to study on this matter because women are more turned on by situations and story than visuals. Everyone's different of course, but its all based on a generalization.Here's the video: 

[Ixum]

I do wish someone would make a SoS addon for a male vagina

[wardrake]

For everyone confused about "T-Boys" scientific studies show that only gay men (and some bi men) are into them when it comes to porn (the key word is PORN). This video explains why straight men love futanari porn and not gay men. While gay men love men-with-vaginas-porn and not straight men.

 

Women aren't as visual as men and have much more complicated sexualities than men so to speak. So research on these things for women is much hard to study on this matter because women are more turned on by situations and story than visuals. Everyone's different of course, but its all based on a generalization.Here's the video: 

 

I knew of futanari already, I don't know if "t-Boys" actually exist, curious about this - not, kinda creeped now. I have a sort of "what if" kind of mind. But anyone has there preferences of sexuality, be they Gay, Bi, or straight.

Figured if there were such individuals (the Futanari) out there and a mod here was made to have futas in skyrim why not men with vagina's.

I don't know what causes the Futanari thing. Dna or is it a gender swap surgery.

I know that Dna is the blueprint of life, it tells what a lifeform will look like. I know that there are hormones (Testosterone and Estrogen) in the body that differ the gender of species. Do futas have both hormones in their body, or are they men sex-changed to have the body of a female.

 

I mean no disrespect toward Futanari (Dick girls) nor anything I commented to be taken negatively.

[Niobia]

 

For everyone confused about "T-Boys" scientific studies show that only gay men (and some bi men) are into them when it comes to porn (the key word is PORN). This video explains why straight men love futanari porn and not gay men. While gay men love men-with-vaginas-porn and not straight men.

 

Women aren't as visual as men and have much more complicated sexualities than men so to speak. So research on these things for women is much hard to study on this matter because women are more turned on by situations and story than visuals. Everyone's different of course, but its all based on a generalization.Here's the video: 

 

I knew of futanari already, I don't know if "t-Boys" actually exist, curious about this - not, kinda creeped now. I have a sort of "what if" kind of mind. But anyone has there preferences of sexuality, be they Gay, Bi, or straight.

Figured if there were such individuals (the Futanari) out there and a mod here was made to have futas in skyrim why not men with vagina's.

I don't know what causes the Futanari thing. Dna or is it a gender swap surgery.

I know that Dna is the blueprint of life, it tells what a lifeform will look like. I know that there are hormones (Testosterone and Estrogen) in the body that differ the gender of species. Do futas have both hormones in their body, or are they men sex-changed to have the body of a female.

 

I mean no disrespect toward Futanari (Dick girls) nor anything I commented to be taken negatively.

 

 

 

Of course they exist. There are a ton of female to male people out there. I honestly have no idea if it's in the millions or hundreds of thousands, but they're out there. As far as porn goes, one is talked about in the video, "Buck Angel". I think it's so bizarre to people because it's uncommon to see in porn so it's still new and strange. Think about the few sheltered people who never even though of the concept of "t-girls" and see them for the first time. I remember being about 15 or 16 and first finding out about them. Blew my mind.

 

Of course with "t-girls" both straight and bi-men like them and straight, gay, and bi women like them depending on the individual. My understanding is that only gay men like "t-boys" and I would assume bi men like them too and maybe bi girls? I have no idea. Either way, these are all made up human words and concepts and in the long run it doesn't matter. People like what they like and we shouldn't let that bother us as long as it doesn't harm real people in the process.

[sen4mi]

For everyone confused about "T-Boys" scientific studies show that only gay men (and some bi men) are into them when it comes to porn (the key word is PORN).

So this one person I knew, who both liked porn and liked gender ambiguity, and who was born unambiguously female and stayed female, she was unscientific?

 

(I was actually hoping to find something in this thread to use to throw in a quip about "someone stole your sweetroll" but I will settle for whining about bs scientific claims, instead.)

[Niobia]

 

For everyone confused about "T-Boys" scientific studies show that only gay men (and some bi men) are into them when it comes to porn (the key word is PORN).

So this one person I knew, who both liked porn and liked gender ambiguity, and who was born unambiguously female and stayed female, she was unscientific?

 

(I was actually hoping to find something in this thread to use to throw in a quip about "someone stole your sweetroll" but I will settle for whining about bs scientific claims, instead.)

 

 

I think either you're misunderstanding something or I'm not understanding what you're saying at all. It sounds like you're just choosing to be offended rather than comprehend the bigger picture of this.

 

If you read everything I said instead of just that sentence, you'll see that I said (and the video said) that studying what women like as far as sexual desire and porn is nearly impossible at the present. Womens' sexual desires are much more complicated because women don't rely **as heavily** on visual cues as men do.

 

This is very new research with practically zero funding. It's not meant to say "hurr durr, this is written in stone. this is absolute". Anyone who has taken a basic science course in college knows that nothing in science is ever final even after 5,000 case studies and 10,000 experiments. This is just based on what they've studied **so far with MEN**. The information and studies done were based around gay and straight men. The only reason I bring up women at all is to point out that they couldn't include women in this study because male and female sexual cues are very different.

 

I hope this explains it. But if you're really interested in it and not just trying to be facetious, then watch the video. Part of the reason so many people are ignorant about this stuff is because so many people have an attitude towards human nature when it doesn't fit their ideology which is based on nothing. If we can't talk about it without being snarky and using fallacies to make some kind of point, then we might as well not talk about it all.

[sen4mi]

 

 

For everyone confused about "T-Boys" scientific studies show that only gay men (and some bi men) are into them when it comes to porn (the key word is PORN).

So this one person I knew, who both liked porn and liked gender ambiguity, and who was born unambiguously female and stayed female, she was unscientific?

 

(I was actually hoping to find something in this thread to use to throw in a quip about "someone stole your sweetroll" but I will settle for whining about bs scientific claims, instead.)

 

 

I think either you're misunderstanding something or I'm not understanding what you're saying at all. It sounds like you're just choosing to be offended rather than comprehend the bigger picture of this.

 

If you read everything I said instead of just that sentence, you'll see that I said (and the video said) that studying what women like as far as sexual desire and porn is nearly impossible at the present. Womens' sexual desires are much more complicated because women don't rely **as heavily** on visual cues as men do.

 

This is very new research with practically zero funding. It's not meant to say "hurr durr, this is written in stone. this is absolute". Anyone who has taken a basic science course in college knows that nothing in science is ever final even after 5,000 case studies and 10,000 experiments. This is just based on what they've studied **so far with MEN**. The information and studies done were based around gay and straight men. The only reason I bring up women at all is to point out that they couldn't include women in this study because male and female sexual cues are very different.

 

I hope this explains it. But if you're really interested in it and not just trying to be facetious, then watch the video. Part of the reason so many people are ignorant about this stuff is because so many people have an attitude towards human nature when it doesn't fit their ideology which is based on nothing. If we can't talk about it without being snarky and using fallacies to make some kind of point, then we might as well not talk about it all.

 

 

I am not being offended, or I do not think I am.

 

I am objecting to the misinformation or misphrasing of the information.

 

Or, if there is no difference between "being offended" and "objecting to a factually incorrect statement" then maybe we need to have a deeper discussion about this attitude stuff?

[Make-Use-Of-ME]

how would I make this an option for random men in the world?